World War I: Britain’s Share of Guilt

the first casualty of war is truthAndreas van de Kamp
Staatsstreich.at
9. September 2014

For mainstream historians Britain’s declaration of war to Germany a hundred years ago was driven by dire necessity. But two recently published books are critical of this notion. The first one posits, that the war was indeed consequence of the conscious encirclement of Germany; a move that was executed by Whitehall, but masterminded by a shadowy elite in the UK. The second book does not share this point of view, but maintains that the British entry to the War was no forgone conclusion at all.

100 years after the starting shot for the XX century, hundreds of books have been published and no one still is paying attention to Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty, which was a political fabrication from the start.

“The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.”

Most of today’s observers have come to rather nuanced conclusions. In their view the war was result of an exceedingly complex situation. And while each and any of the European powers had contributed to such an instable system not one of them was able to manage it. Christopher Clarks “Sleepwalkers” illustrates this line of thinking.

Gerry Docherty und James Macgregor try to draw a different picture. In their “Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War” they say, that a certain faction of Britain’s upper class is to blame. In essence Docherty and MacGregor concur with the so called encirclement doctrine, which became popular in Germany beginning in 1907 – and again after the German surrender in 1918 and the horrible consequences of the defeat.

Of course Docherty and Macgregor, both Scotsmen, do not have to rely on the word of German leaders, who after the war had every motive to deflect attention from themselves. They try to make sense of what has been unearthed during the last 100 years. That is the strongest point of the book. The weakest point is, that they are not able to produce something like a “smoking gun” for their main argument. Theirs is a new and old narrative of what had been happening before the start of the war. In this regard, it does not differ from the accounts, which are given by the mainstream historians. Much of their narrative can’t be referenced either.

The secret elite came into being during the last 20 years of the 19th century. It was an offspring of the traditional English upper class, mainly consisting of aristocrats, manufacturers and top level civil servants. Caroll Quigley, an American history professor, calls the clique in question “Milner group”, after one of the trustees for Cecil Rhode’s legacy. Cecil Rhodes and Lord Salisbury were the “departure points”, from where the band had started out. Both of them died after the turn of the century. They cannot be counted as players in the years leading up to 1914.

The Milner group in itself for sure has to be considered. Writes Quigley: “To be sure, this secret society is not a childish thing like the Ku Klux Klan, and it does not have any secret robes, secret handclasps, or secret passwords. It does not need any of these, since its members know each other intimately.”

The conspirators must have become convinced that their own business, even the very existence of the British Empire, was endangered by Berlin. That’s why they ushered in a long term policy to isolate and destroy their continental enemy No. 1.

After a landslide election defeat in 1906 the Tories, to which the Milner group had a natural leaning, lost power. But for various reasons this did not affect the political clout of the cabal.

Although almost all members of the bloc had been conservatives, the “chief exceptions were the four leaders of the Liberal Party after Gladstone, who were strong imperialists: Rosebery, Asquith, Edward Grey, and Haldane. These four supported the Boer War, grew increasingly anti-German, supported the World War in 1914, and were close to the Milner Group politically, intellectually, and socially.”

So ironically whig governments turned out to be the ones, that let Britain side with detested czarist Russia. They prepared the war against the central powers. To conceal that to Liberal MPs, his political base, Grey had to resort to permanent obfuscation and disinformation. The crucial year came in 1907, when a British-Russian convention was signed, thereby giving birth to the Triple Entente. This change of sea was accompanied by Alaxander Isvolsky on the Russian side, whom Docherty and Macgregor suspect to have been an asset of their hidden élite.

“The growth of national resentments across the Balkans against Turkey and Austria-Hungary”, they write, ” was deliberately stirred by the agents of the Secret Elite”.

“Serbia was groomed for a very special role. She was perfectly placed as the epicentre for a seismic explosion, that would blow away the old order.”

“(But) As far as the secret elite was concerned, the raison d’etre for the Balkan crisis was to get Austria to react to severe provocation in order to draw Germany in. It was about Germany. It had always been about Germany.”

In the previous crises in the Balkans and North Africa Germany had reacted in a rather defensive mode and the only blame that could be attached to Berlin in July 1914 was, that it did not urge more restraint from Austria Hungary. But Germany’s Geo-strategic position was already set at this point in time and could not have been altered.

This angle is very much contrary to what German students were told in high school and the opposite of what their mainstream professional historians have taught (at least after Fritz Fischer’s Germany’s aims in the First World War in 1961).*

Douglas Newton, the author of the second book, is not an academic outsider like the Scotsmen, but he is not English either. He is Australian and he is much more mainstream than Docherty/Macgregor. His recently published “Darkest Days” deals with what happened in London the week before the British declaration of war in London. Newton doubts that the UK had no choice but to enter the war.

He concentrates on how the war party in the Asquith government managed to have its will, although many Liberal MPs objected to a war.

“The minority of Cabinet interventionists eventually ‘jockeyed’ the neutralist majority into a rushed choice for war on Sunday 2. August, in the shape of a pledge of naval assistance to France. The pledge locked Britain into any war before news of the German ultimatum to Belgium.”

“Throughout the crisis, the Cabinet’s pro-Entente leaders were manipulative and deceptive. They made crucial decisions outside the Cabinet, which steered the neutralist majority toward war. There was no democratic decision for war.”

But neither Asquith’s deception tactics during the July crisis nor the (un)democratic character of its decision are at the core of the issue. The English politicians might have acted hesitantly then and they might have squandered opportunities to preserve peace in doing so.

But all in all London cannot be blamed to have jumped the gun or to have acted as a fire accelerant – not in July 1914. Of course the same can be said of Kaiser Wilhelm and his chancellor Bethmann Hollweg at the time.

This is true, although there had been powerful lobbies both in England and Germany, pushing their respective country onto a path to war.

It was prior to July 1914, that Asquith, Haldane, Churchill, Grey and Lloyd George had been at the service of the war party in UK: by their massive naval rearmament (which, admittedly, can be seen as a response to German action); by their plans to strangle Germany by a naval blockade, by the creation of an expeditionary force and their secret diplomacy with France and Russia, as well as their help in corrupting the Belgian neutrality. The whole Triple Entente was not a defensive scheme to boot.

One can regard this as the natural foreign policy of Liberal imperialists. Or you can concur with Docherty/Macgregor in saying, that those politicians had helped in fulfilling the wish of an all powerful secret group, the destruction of a competing world power by all means necessary.

***

Andreas van de Kamp is an independent Journalist

SOURCE:  http://staatsstreich.at/world-war-i-britains-share-of-guilt.html

* Indeed, to this day, school children in occupied Germany are indoctrinated to believe the long discredited view that World War I was entirely due to “German aggression”.  When asked, many balk at the notion that it could have been anything else. They will tell you that you must be crazy.

Why this indoctrination? Because it otherwise may lead them to question German guilt with respect to World War II (and everything else under the sun). That is strictly “VERBOTEN!”

Free Germany

Posted in England, Germany, Great Britain, Versailles, Word War I | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Dominic Alexander debunks Ten Myths used to Justify the Slaughter of the First World War

Ten Lies Told about World War I
November 9, 2014, Counterfire.org

This Remembrance Day will doubtless see strenuous efforts by some to justify the fruitless bloodbath that was the First World War. Revisionist commentators have long attempted to rehabilitate the conflict as necessary and just, but the arguments do not stand up. It does no service to the memory of the dead to allow any illusions in the justice or necessity of war, particularly so when the precedents will be used to argue for the next ‘necessary’ conflict. From the causes of the war, to its prosecution and its results, here are the counter-arguments to ten common pro-war ploys.

An American soldier lies dead, tangled in barbed wire on the western front. Photograph: American Stock Archive/Getty Images

An American soldier lies dead, tangled in barbed wire on the western front. Photograph: American Stock Archive/Getty Images

1. The war was fought in defence of democracy.

This is contradicted by the basic facts. Germany had universal manhood suffrage while in Britain, including Ireland, some 40% of men still did not qualify for the vote. In Germany also, there were attempts to justify the war on the grounds that it was being fought to defend civilised values against a repressive, militaristic state, in the form of Russian autocracy.

2. Britain went to war due to a treaty obligation to defend the neutrality of Belgium.

There was no clear and accepted obligation on Britain to do this, and, in fact, before the Belgian issue appeared, the war party in the cabinet was already pushing for British intervention on the entirely different ground that there were naval obligations to France. These obligations had been developed in secret arrangements between the military of both countries, and were never subject to any kind of democratic accountability. The Germans even offered guarantees over Belgian integrity, which the British government refused to consider at all.

3. German aggression was the driving force for war.

However aggressive the German leadership may have been in 1914, the British establishment was at least as determined to take the opportunity to go to war with its imperial rival. At one point the Foreign Office even seized on imaginary German incursions into France to justify a British declaration of war on Germany. The declaration letter had to be retrieved from the German ambassador and rewritten when it was discovered that the stories were false. The enthusiasm of the British ruling class for war undermines any justification for it based on German aggression.

4. Germany had started a naval arms race with Britain.

Imperialist competition between the two states over markets and resources preceded the arms race in the fifteen years before the war. Britain’s naval power was the vital element in its ability to restrict German access to markets and resources across the world. Unless Britain was willing to allow Germany to expand economically, the logic of capitalist competition meant that Germany was bound to challenge British naval supremacy. The latent violence of the leading imperial nation is always the context for aggressive challenges to the status quo on the part of rising powers.

5. German imperialism was uniquely vicious and had to be challenged.

The atrocities committed against the Herrero people in Namibia were indeed terrible crimes, but were hardly unique compared to the horrors committed by all those involved in the rubber industry in the Belgian Congo, to take but one example. Also, European opinion had only a few years before 1914 been horrified by the brutality of another colonial power when it was engaged in ruthlessly expanding its dominance over independent states in Africa. This was Britain in its wars of aggression against the Boer states in South Africa, during which concentration camps were first used in order to control a civilian population.

6. Public opinion was united in favour of the war, as shown by images of cheering crowds in 1914.

It is now usually admitted that the degree of enthusiasm for the war was strictly limited, and the evidence is that the crowds who gathered at the outbreak of war were by no means united in martial enthusiasm. In fact sizeable and widespread anti-war demonstrations occurred in both Britain and Germany. Had the leaderships of Labour and Socialist parties across Europe not caved into demands to support their national ruling classes in going to war, it is quite possible that the conflict could have been stopped in its tracks.

7. The morale of British troops fighting on the Western Front remained intact to the end of the war.

While Britain may not have suffered quite the same scale of mutinies as in the German and French armies, at times there were whole stretches of the front where troops became so unreliable that generals did not dare order them into combat. The evidence for widespread cynicism about war strategies, contempt for the military leadership, and grave doubts about the purpose of the war, cannot be wished away by the revisionists. In so far as soldiers carried on willingly fighting the war, the explanation needs to be sought in the habituation to obedience, as well as the threat of court-martial executions. There is no need to invoke either fervid nationalism or any kind of deep psychological blood-lust as explanations.

8. The military leadership, notably General Haig, was not a bunch of incompetent ‘donkeys’.

Attempts to rehabilitate the likes of General Haig founder on some of the basic facts about the tactics he relentlessly employed. Repeated infantry attacks on opposing trenches consistently failed to gain any clear advantage, while causing colossal casualties. On the first day of the battle of the Somme, 1st July 1916, 57,000 troops out of 120,000 were killed or wounded. Despite continuing carnage on an incredible scale, Haig carried on ordering further attacks. When any hope of a breakthrough against the German lines was clearly lost, the purpose of the battle was shifted to attrition pure and simple. The plan now was to kill more German troops than the British lost. Since there was no way of reliably measuring the casualties on the other side, Haig relied on estimating it through the losses of his own side. On this basis he began to be angered when the army suffered too few losses, as when he complained that one division in September had lost under a thousand men. There can be no defence for this kind of disregard of human life.

9. The end of the war saw the triumph of liberal capitalism, against collapsing autocratic Empires.

In fact all states involved in the war were deeply destabilised. Even the United States, whose involvement was the most limited, experienced the ‘Red Summer’ of 1919, with unprecedented labour revolts, such as the Seattle general strike, alongside savage repression of socialists and black Americans. Britain saw the beginning of the Irish war of independence, and increasing unrest in India, which marks, in effect, the point at which the Empire began to unravel. Domestically, there was also a wave of radical working-class unrest, particularly in the ‘Red Clydeside’, which culminated in troops being sent into Glasgow to impose martial law.

10. The war achieved anything worthwhile whatsoever.

The war opened up a period of endemic economic dislocation, and outright crisis. In Britain there was a decade of industrial decline and high unemployment even before the Great Depression.

In effect, it was only the Second World War which brought the major capitalist powers out of the slump. The First World War saw the point at which capitalism became addicted to war and to a permanent arms economy.

The war demonstrated the capacity of capitalism to create industrialised waste, carnage and destruction on a colossal scale. The remembrance of the war is appropriately a time for mourning the horror, the loss and the waste of it all, but it should also provoke a determination to resist our rulers’ insistence on promoting war to further their interests. War can achieve nothing other than to create the conditions for further wars.

Popular opinion has, ever since its ending, remembered the First World War as a time of horrendous and futile misery and slaughter, as epitomising political and military leaders’ incompetence and callous disregard for human life. That popular judgement, which has helped turn common opinion against war in general, was correct, and we must not let the war mongers dismiss this instance of the wisdom of ordinary people.

[Emphasis added]

***

Dominic Alexander is a member of Counterfire, for which he is the book review editor. He has been a Stop the War and anti-austerity activist in north London for some time. He is a published historian whose work includes the book Saints and Animals in the Middle Ages, a social history of medieval wonder tales

SOURCE: http://www.counterfire.org/history/17511-ten-lies-told-about-world-war-i

My Comment:   Obviously I enjoyed the article and agree.  I think most informed and rational thinking people would. It is interesting to note, however, that with respect to WWI, the “revisionists” are those who are trying to re-establish the already long discredited ‘official version’ and legacy of that Not So Great War, as it was originally sold to the masses, though with shiny new wrapping paper. In other words, that those “evil nasty Germans were to blame”. Repeat as necessary.

With respect to WWII, however, the “revisionists” are those of us who have re-investigated the ‘official version’ as presented (or invented) by the Victors and their lackeys, and who have been bringing forward evidence which contradicts and often fully discredits their narrative. And it is precisely that false narrative which has been used and recycled ever since the end of  WWII right up to the present day, in order to justify virtually every new war which those same “capitalists” desire.

Lest we forget …. (or in case you didn’t know) National Socialism was “Socialist”.  Truly socialist, and neither Marxist nor Capitalist.  It was the only model which ever worked to the benefit of both the wealthy industrialists and entrepreneurial class, and the workers. Germany did not recover and prosper as a result of re-arming, but rather, by building civilian infrastructure and services, strengthening agriculture, cottage industries, auto-manufacturing, new industries with scientific and technological advancements, as well as, sound environmental protection policies and land reclamation projects, as well as, recycling to severely reduce reliance upon imports and exports, and the need for territorial expansion and the theft of other nation’s resources.

It also did not come by stealing property from the rich (not even the Jews) in order to give to the poor, or by overly taxing the rich, but rather, through social reforms and benefits for the working class, which achieved a fair and equitable balance that benefited the whole German nation, making her prosperous, and the envy of all.

The World Wide Jewish inspired boycott of Germany in 1933 did indeed cause severe hardship. Germany also had no gold reserves and was burdened with incredible debt, mainly due to war reparations. But putting Germans back into positions of control and influence, combined with German ingenuity, banking and monetary reform,  restrictions on stock markets, a strong work ethic, and brotherly love in the true Christian spirit helped Germany to not only survive the hardships, but to thrive, whilst all other industrialized nations lagged behind in economic depression. Their own economic state following the Great Depression was naturally made worse by the boycott of German goods, as it hindered global trade which their own model relied upon. Rather than emulating the German model in some form in order to help themselves out of their economic woes, the western capitalist war mongers, the Bankster Gangsters, and their political puppets created the necessity and desire for war, and they began re-arming, and even helped the Soviet Communists to do the same.  So while the Germans planted a plentiful harvest for themselves, the western war mongers (including Jews who had left Germany when they lost their advantaged positions) were sewing the seeds of hate and plotting the destruction of a truly Christian nation.

The ALL LIES had the motive for war. They only needed a pretext and the opportunity.  Germany had no need or desire for a war, as Hitler had made clear beginning with his first speech as Chancellor and in many well documented diplomatic exchanges.  “Oh, but Hitler re-armed too!” some will say.  Obviously, to maintain her own sovereignty, Germany had to re-arm to the degree necessary to protect her own interests and territory from foreign aggression, beginning in about 1936, but by 1939 was largely self-sufficient and had enough trading partners to provide other essential goods. She had also made every possible effort to avoid a war with Poland through generous concessions concerning Danzig, as is also well documented.  It was the ALL LIES, through their guarantees to Poland which incited the Poles, not only to intransigence, but indeed, to Anti-German hostility and gross human rights violations including mass murder (which the world chose to ignore) which led to Germany’s declaration of war, thereby, providing the western war mongers with their much desired pretext and opportunity to attack Germany.

To those who scream “but you forgot the Holocaust!” May I remind you that the first casualty of war is truth.  May I also remind you that there are two sides to every story. I have previously covered virtually every aspect of World War II from the previously untold German perspective, including many documents, speeches, films, books, as well as, articles and talks from notable, trained and honest non-German historians. I also have provided a virtual library of free books in my links section, as well as, an Amazon affiliate book store full of credible and well sourced books that tell a completely different version of Hitler, National Socialism and World War II than has hitherto been peddled to the masses through the mass media, and in the indoctrination camps called “schools” and “universities”.  I have barely even scratched the surface concerning Allied War Crimes committed both during and after the war. Believe me, I know the orthodox victors history all too well! Do you know the other side? Do you even have the courage to look?

My challenge to you, is for you to examine all of the material I have presented from start to finish, and then tell me whether or not you still believe what you have been taught, sold and had instilled in you. Then, maybe we can have a sane and rational discussion about the crimes for which the Germans were accused and found guilty of in an international Kangaroo court called the IMT, who ran it, and about the types of evidence they considered and admitted. Then you tell me what you believe, or still want to believe.

~ J4G

 

Posted in England, Germany, holocaust, Word War I, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Radio Interview with Deanna Spingola, November 24th, 2014

Deanna Spingola

Deanna

I was honoured to be Deanna Spingola’s guest on Monday, November 24th, 2014, along with my friend Chris Sandau. I talked a little bit about this past year and some things that have happened, and I reiterated what my mission is, and what it is not. We discussed my approach and the impact that my efforts have had, in spite of efforts to derail me. I also shared a few random e-mails that I have received.  Finally, I was then very pleased to introduce Chris to Deanna and to her listening audience, and he did a great job speaking about his own ordeal over the past few weeks after losing his job as a minor hockey coach.

Thank you Deanna for the invitation, for your continued support of my work, for Chris, and for your dedication to truth and justice for the German people!

Download Free mp3

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/deanna2/2014/11/24/spingola-and-friends

Following the show, I received the following e-mail comment from a fellow German, which I feel compelled to share:

“The charge of hatred comes up a lot when trying to defend German honour. If you don’t like that people sling mud at your heritage, you must be a “hater”. In other words: love the mudslinger, and don’t even mind the mud. So many twisted minds resulting from decades of propaganda!   Well, I have to confess that I am a hater. I hate injustice, lies, dishonesty, humiliation, bullying, and extortion. Can’t help myself. ” ~ Fritz

Well said !

***

PS  To the one and only person complaining to me about receiving my posts via e-mail, it is because YOU subscribed, and NOT because I am sending them out. If you no longer want to receive them, please don’t complain to me. Simply UNSUBSCRIBE.  If you are not smart enough to accomplish that, find someone who is. Because I am tired of you too.

Posted in Activism, Canada, Germany, Interviews, National Socialism, World War III | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Leading German Journalist admits CIA routinely ‘Bribed’ him; Germany is a colony of the USA

Udo Ulfkotte a former Editor of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, one of Germany’s largest and most influential newspapers. He has now become a whistleblower and gone public about his own long-term activities as a CIA asset, and how all major and respected German media, like the media in other Western countries, is controlled by the CIA and unnamed U.S. based billionaires, and big transatlantic organizations.

He states that Germany is little more than a U.S. controlled Banana Republic (as we have long known and previously stated in our posts) which he concludes the U.S. aristocracy that controls the CIA wants to bring about, or else to bring closer to the brink. Ulfkotte now believes that this broad and pervasive corruption is bringing Europe close to a new major war with Russia.

In this RT Interview which was uploaded to YouTube on Sept 29, 2014 Ulfkotte told Russian Television:

“I’ve been a journalist for about 25 years, and I’ve been educated to lie, to betray, and not to tell the truth to the public! The German and American media tries to bring war to the people in Europe, to bring war to Russia. This is a point of no return, and I am going to stand up and say it is not right what I have done in the past, to manipulate people, to make propaganda against Russia, and it is not right what my colleagues do, and have done in the past, because they are bribed to betray the people not only in Germany, all over Europe. I am very fearful of a new war in Europe, and I don’t like to have this situation again, because war is never coming from itself, there is always people who push for war, and this is not only politicians, it is journalists too. We have betrayed our readers, just to push for war. I don’t want this anymore, I’m fed up with this propaganda. We live in a banana republic, and not in a democratic country where we have press freedom.

The German media, especially, my colleagues, day by day, write against the Russians, [these journalists] who are in transatlantic organizations, and who are supported by the United States to do so.

I became ‘honorary citizen of the state of Oklahoma,’ Why? Because I write pro-American. I was supported by the Central Intelligence Agency, the CIA. Why? Because I am pro-American. I am fed up with it; I don’t want to do it anymore; and so I have just written a book, not to earn money, no, it will cause a lot of trouble for me. [I wrote it instead] to give the people in this country, Germany, in Europe, and all over the world, just a glimpse of … what goes on behind the closed doors.”

Other selected quotes from the video:

[4:40] “Most of the journalists you see in foreign countries, European or American journalists, like me in the past, are so-called non-official cover. Non-official cover means what? You do work for an intelligence agency, but when they [the public] find out that you are not only a journalist but a spy too, they [the CIA] will never say this was one of our guys. So, I have helped them in several situations, and I feel ashamed for that. I feel ashamed that I was bribed by billionaires, I was bribed by the Americans, not to report exactly the truth.

I was just imagining in my car while I was driving to this interview, I just try to work out in my brain what would have happened if I had written a pro-Russian article, in the Frankfurter Allgemeine. Well, we were all educated to write pro-European, pro-American, but please not pro-Russian. But this is not what I understand for democracy, for press freedom, I am very sorry for that.”

[6:30] “Germany is still a kind of a colony of the United States, you’ll see that in many points; like for example, the majority of Germany do not want to have nukes in our country, but we still have American nukes; so, we are still a kind of an American colony, and, being a colony, it is very easy to approach young journalists through (and what is very important here is) transatlantic organizations. All journalists from respected and big German newspapers, magazines, radio stations, TV stations, they are all members or guests of those big transatlantic organizations, and in these transatlantic organizations you are approached to be pro-American, and … they invite you for seeing the United States, they pay for that, they pay all your expenses and everything. So, you are bribed, you get more and more corrupt, because they make you good contacts. … So, you make friends, you think they are your friends and cooperate with them. They ask you, ‘will you do me this favor,’ ‘will you do me that favor,’ so your brain is more and more brainwashed, through these guys.

[Is this only the case with German journalists?] No, I think it is especially the case with British journalists, because they have a much closer relationship. It is especially the case with Israeli journalists. Of course with French journalists. It is the case for Australians, [with] journalists from New Zealand, from Taiwan, well, there is many countries, like Jordan for example.”

[9:17] “Sometimes the intelligence agencies, they come to your office, and want you to write an article. I just remember [for example] that the German foreign intelligence agency, the Bundesnachrichtendienst – it is just a sister organization of the Central Intelligence Agency, see it was founded by the American intelligence agency came to my office, and they wanted me to write an article about Libya and about Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.They gave me all these secret informations, and they just wanted me to sign the article with my name. I did that. It was published in the Frankfurter Allgemeine, it was about how he secretly tried to build a poison gas factory, it was a story that was printed worldwide days later, but I had no information on that [the CIA wrote it].”

***

As we have previously reported …

Putin - Germany is an Occupied CountryAnd you thought that Germany was “liberated” in 1945, and that, thanks to the sacrifices of your nation’s brave soldiers, you too “live in a free country” today. Or maybe you are one of those kooky conspiracy theorists who actually believes that the “evil Nazis secretly took over America after WWII”? Dream on!

Well, congratulations to Ulfkotte for coming clean about his past and about the state of media affairs and corruption in the FRG/BRD and also in the rest of the western world.  Sadly, he is a little bit vague about these U.S. based “billionaires” and about the “transatlantic organizations”  which are controlling these countries and world affairs and pushing for war. We are left to guess.

Might it be the “International Bankster Gangsters” such as Rothschilds, Rockefellers, J.P. Morgans, et al (Federal Reserve cartel and Wall Street), International Zionists,  Freemasons, Military Industrial Complex, and the CFR, etc?

It seems to me that a certain other individual in the past also warned us of such an international conspiracy against Germany.

What was his name again?

My question to Mr. Putin is, when are you going to come clean about the role of the Soviet Union in World War II? That includes: Stalin’s plans to attack Germany while Hitler was busy fighting the French and the English in the West, and Hitler’s pre-emptive strike against the Soviet forces to thwart that attack, as well as; the truth about what brutal Soviet forces did to the German citizens and soldiers (and the international Waffen SS forces) when they finally overran Germany. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, come clean about the BIG LIES the Soviets subsequently told at the IMT to slander and demonize the Germans to this day?

If you truly are a friend of Germany as you claim Mr. Putin, and if you really wish to prevent a new global war, then it is in your interest and ours, and indeed, that of the world at large, to finally stand up and to TELL THE TRUTH about World War II!

Posted in Germany, Interviews, News, USA, World War III | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

German Ingenuity Provides a Means to Protect Earnings Against Inflation and Increase Your Wealth

Earlier this year I became an affiliate member of Karatbars International, a German company based in Stuttgart. The company was founded in 2011 serving a handful of European countries, but are now doing business in over 120 countries worldwide. Why? What are Karatbars? Well, this is pure German genius! Karatbars are are small denominations of pure gold bullion embedded into a card the size of a credit card, with built in certification, and which can be used as an alternative pure gold currency, right now or in the future, when the global financial system financially crashes. Please watch the above 21 minute introductory ‘overview’ video.

karatbar_classicI have long understand the problem of Fiat Currency and Usury, and the value of owning gold as a hedge against inflation. But at today’s prices, most people simply could never afford gold, including me. Karatbars makes it affordable! But there is much more.

With Karatbars, we can protect our earnings and have a ready made, alternative, private issue, global gold currency in our hands. These will pay for a tank of gas or a cart full of groceries, or a new set of clothes. By informing others about this, we can help to ensure the survival of our local communities and economies from the coming global financial crash. But we can also earn great residual passive income and even FREE gold for referring others!

inflationIt costs nothing to sign up as an affiliate member. You can refer others and earn straight commissions without any purchases. But if you want to earn greater commissions in perpetuity, you can acquire a affiliate package for as little as Euro 99.00 or $130.00 US which unlocks the door to a life time of earnings.

The affiliate program is like no other on Earth. It provides us a means for “compound earnings” that far exceed the rate of inflation! But this is no “pyramid scheme” or “MLM”.  The real pyramid scheme is Central Banking and the usury system.  This is a perfectly legal and legitimate  E-commerce company with a great and timely product.

There are absolutely no purchase requirements.  We do not buy products and sell them to others. We simply acquire gold and refer others to the company, and they do the same. In this system, it is entirely possible for someone below to do better than someone who is above. The beauty of it is, that this is all still in its infancy!

I must add that Karatbars International is rock solid financially, debt free, and does not deal with the banksters, except insofar as it is necessary to process payments within the current money system. The company is also not listed on any stock exchange! Nonetheless, the company is growing rapidly and recently moved to a much larger office complex in Stuttgart to keep up with the global demand.

We affiliates are in essence the real “share holders” and are its life blood. There is no usury, no debt and compound interest involved here! It is a closed system in which we can begin to exchange our nearly worthless paper and digital debt-based fiat currency for something real, which holds its value: pure currency grade gold bullion, in a secure, practical and “spendable” form.

I have researched this fully and have been doing it myself. I invite my readers to also take advantage and secure your position now by registering your free account under my sponsorship. Then, acquire your affiliate package a.s.a.p. at whatever level you can afford to get into the Dual Team system. That unlocks the door for perpetual earnings through referring others, who then do the same.

Duplication is what the affiliate program is all about! As said in the video, if you were offered a choice of 1 million dollars or a penny which would double in value, each day, for a month, which would you take? Most would take the million dollars. But the penny would increase into over 10 million dollars within 30 days! That is the power of duplication! That is why I say this is about “compound earnings” as opposed to the “compound interest” of the International Bankster Gangsters who control the paper money, print it and charge interest to enslave us all!  So now we have a real remedy and a system that benefits us, we the people, not “them”!

What is also great about the Karatbars Affiliate program, is that we activists can use our earnings to fund our projects and activities, and not have to merely rely only on donations. Indeed, there are many movements, groups and individuals who could benefit from this. Think about it!

Furthermore, if you are a business owner, you can also participate for free in the global “K-Exchange” program and register your company on the Karatbars site as a business which accepts Karatbars in exchange for goods and services.  You can also have custom designed Karatbars gold cards made up for advertising purposes, and as gifts for your customers.  There are also many “specialty cards” available which make great and valuable gifts, such as this:

karatbar_xmas2
So, if you are interested, whether in becoming an affiliate member or simply becoming a customer and acquiring gold, I invite you to register your free account under my sponsorship with this link: http://tinyurl.com/qcshcp2

Next, choose “registration”  and then “affiliate” or “customer”.  I also advise you to choose your “user name” wisely, as that will form part of your own public referral link.

Thank you for reading and watching the video. I look forward to welcoming you to the global Karatbars family, and am also here to provide support to those who join my team.

Finally, whether through participating in the Karatbars program, through making donations, purchasing books through my Amazon affiliate book store, or simply by sharing my posts and videos, etc  I thank you and wish you all a great Christmas holiday season!

J4G

Posted in Activism, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments