World War II for Israel predicted in 1938 on the basis of the NOT FORGED Protocols of Zion

Jewish World Conspiracy by Karl Bergmeister (1938)A little-known 1938 booklet “Jewish World Conspiracy” by Karl Bergmeister” rejected the 1935 decision of a Berne Court (overturned on appeal) that the Protocols of Zion were a forgery. It foresaw that World War Two was an Illuminati (Masonic) Jewish trap.

“Their world war is a necessity in order that, in the name of indivisible peace, all that portion of mankind who wish to cast off the Jewish yoke, may be laid low.” Revue internationale des sociétés secrétes, April,1937


“This fight for world-domination has been in full swing ever since Italian Fascism put an end to the destructive activities of Freemasonry, that most dangerous of all Jewish secret societies, and since Germany has declared openly that it is the Jew, and the Jew alone who is the driving force behind the destruction of political order among the different peoples. In complete accordance with the sense of Protocol 7, the dogs of war are to be let loose against those states who desire to free themselves from the Jewish reign of terror, such states as Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Poland.

On the above subject the following forms an interesting extract from the “Revue internationale des sociétés secrétes, No7 of the 1st of April 1937:

“A new war in defence of democracy and of alleged law is being prepared in all haste. An alliance of all the Jewish groups is already complete; it bears the official title of the alliance of the three great democracies, the English, the American, and the French. . . . Israel requires a new world war, and soon! . . . Israel is positively of the opinion that time is getting short. To them their world war is a necessity in order that, in the name of indivisible peace, all that portion of mankind who wish to cast off the Jewish yoke, may be laid low.”

It is just the three countries above mentioned who to-day are completely under Jewish-Masonic control. Practically every member of their respective governments is a Freemason. In their case also in all key positions, men of Jewish origin are to be found, or persons who either as a result of marriage, or of financial obligation, are open to Jewish influence.”


A Conference of the World Service, the international organisation for defence against Jewish aggression in all countries, took place in Erfurt from the 2nd to the 5th of September of this year. Distinguished experts, authors and political leaders, more especially from the following countries, took part: Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Great-Britain, Finland, Greece, Holland, Italy, Jugoslavia, Canada, Lettland, the U.S.A., Norway, Austria, Poland, Russia (Emigration), Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, South Africa, Czechoslovakia and Hungary. After the commission appointed to enquire into the authenticity of the Protocols had rendered a report of its two years of activity, the Congress unaminously adopted the following Resolution.

“That the present Conference of the World Service taking place at Erfurt from the 2nd to the 5th of September 1937, in which many experts, authors and political leaders from more than 20 different countries are taking part, passes the following resolution relative to the authenticity of “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”:

That the verdict given in Berne on the 14th of May 1935 to the effect that the Protocols are a forgery, is a faulty verdict. That it only became possible in consequence of the Judge having erroneously based his judgement upon the expertises of the two Swiss experts recommended by the Jewish side C. A. Loosli and Professor A. Baumgarten, after he had heard the 16 witnesses for the Jewish side, and after having refused to hear any single one of the 40 witnesses brought by the Aryan side.

The verdict in Berne has not shaken the authenticity of the Protocols. For their authenticity the following irrefutable fact, among many others, bears witness namely, that Jewry in the social, political, and religious sphere, persistently model all their actions along the lines laid down in the Protocols.”The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” are accordingly the authentic programme of Jewish world politics. “

 Read Online

Download PDF


Additional Information:

World-Service (German, Welt-Dienst and French, Service Mondial) was an international National Socialist news agency founded December 1, 1933 in Erfurt, Germany by Ulrich Fleischhauer. World-Service issued news bulletins in eight languages. [1] The service would run advertisements in their bulletins for various Shirt Movements throughout the world.[1]

From 1936 to 1938 World-Service sponsored the international conference of the Pan-Aryan Anti-Jewish Union. World-Service was also known as the International Correspondence for Enlightenment on the Jewish Question.


The Pan-Aryan Anti-Jewish Union also known as the Erfurt Anti-Comintern Conference and World Conference against International Jewry was an international conference, held in secret, and chaired by Ulrich Fleischhauer in Erfurt, Germany. The conferences sponsored by World Service news agency were held from 1936 to 1938 with 60 to 70 delegates attending from 25 countries.

Henry Hamilton Beamish (1937)[1]
George Deatherage (1937,1938)[2]
Robert Edward Edmondson
Ernest F. Elmhurst (1937)[3]
Arnold Leese


Robert Edward Edmondson (born Dayton, Ohio in 1872, died Bend, Oregon April 12, 1959)[1] was a journalist, researcher, and a defendant in the Great Sedition Trial of 1944. He was a delegate to the Pan-Aryan Anti-Jewish Union held in National Socialist Germany in the 1930s. Edmondson was a prolific Jew-wise researcher and leading propagandist equal to Germany’s Joseph Goebbels. He described himself as an American Vigilante Patriot.[2]

Edmondson said:

“I am not against Jews because of their religion, as a race, a people or as individuals, but because Jewish leadership [i.e. the bankers] is actively anti-American, is attempting to jettison the American political philosophy and take over the Country, and that I would continue to be anti-Jewish until Jewry repudiated such subversion. Were the offender any other than the Jewish minority, my attitude would be precisely the same. This problem is the biggest and most acute thing in the world today…. “Knowing that pitiless publicity is the only cure for public evils, in 1934 I started on a campaign to expose Jewish Anti-Americanism and Talmudic Communism which has been called the “Code of Hell”: a “Rabbi Racket” that victimizes its own followers; an international “Satanic System” subverting France, Britain, Germany and Russia, causing the present depression and moving to take over the United States through the Jewish Radical administration [of FDR.] “

Jew-wise researcher

Edmondson in the 1930s and 1940s documented the Jewish control of America in banking, the press and media in a series of essays which numbered over 400[4] called American Vigilante Bulletins. His research on Jewish domination of entertainment media [1] was the forerunner to Who Rules America? written and distributed decades later by Dr. William L. Pierce.

Edmondson was prolific in the number of broadsides and pamphlets that he issued each month. Between 1934 and 1936 its been estimated he distributed over five million pieces of literature.[5]

He believed President Franklin Roosevelt to be Jewish and published the flier Roosevelt’s Jewish Ancestry to make his case.

He appears to be the author of the 1938 pamphlet B’nai B’rith: An International Anti-Christian, Pro-Communist Jewish Power. The pamphlet was issued under the name John Merrick Church.


On June 11, 1936 Edmondson was indicted by a Jew-majority Grand Jury in New York City and charged with “libeling all persons of the Jewish Religion.” In preparing his defense Edmondson subpoenaed some of the most prominent Jews of the time: Bernard Buruch, Henry Morganthau, Rabbi Stephen Wise, Samuel Untermeyer, New York City mayor Fiorello LaGuardia, James P. Warburg, Walter Lippmann and Justice Samuel Rosenman. In response, the American Jewish Committee petitioned the court to drop the charges against Edmondson. On May 10, 1938 the judge dismissed all indictments claiming there is no group libel law.

In the early 1940s Edmondson was again persecuted by the Jews and was indicted along with 29 others on charges of sedition. The Great Sedition Trial of 1944, as it became known, was declared a mistrial and the charges were later dismissed.


Note: Bernard Buruch, Henry Morganthau, Rabbi Stephen Wise, Samuel Untermeyer, New York City mayor Fiorello LaGuardia, James P. Warburg, Walter Lippmann and Justice Samuel Rosenman all belonged to the very same well organized criminal cabal which called themselves “International Jewry” or “Judea”,  which had declared war on Germany in 1933, just as the NSDAP was elected to power in Germany and Hitler was appointed Chancellor in 1933. Henry Morganthau, unquestionably, was the architect of the plan to exterminate all Germans. (More info at the bottom)

There can be no doubt that they were the “Henchmen” for the “Learned Elders of Zion” and also, the puppet-masters of political whores and war mongers Daladier, Reynaud, Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin. Most are aware of the latter three, but pertaining to the French Prime Ministers:

“In October 1938, Daladier opened secret talks with the Americans on how to bypass American neutrality laws and allow the French to buy American aircraft to make up for productivity deficiencies in the French aircraft industry.[3] Daladier commented in October 1938, “If I had three or four thousand aircraft, Munich would never have happened”, and he was most anxious to buy American war planes as the only way to strengthen the French Air Force.[4] A major problem in the Franco-American talks was how the French were to pay for the American planes, as well as how to bypass the American neutrality acts[5] In addition, France had defaulted on its World War I debts in 1932 and hence fell foul of the American Johnson Act of 1934, which forbade loans to nations that had defaulted on their World War I debts.[6] In February 1939, the French offered to cede their possessions in the Caribbean and the Pacific together with a lump sum payment of 10 billion francs, in exchange for the unlimited right to buy, on credit, American aircraft.[7] After torturous negotiations, an arrangement was worked out in the spring of 1939 to allow the French to place huge orders with the American aircraft industry; though most of the aircraft ordered had not arrived in France by 1940, the Americans arranged for French orders to be diverted to the British.[8]


“Reynaud returned to the cabinet in 1938 as Minister of Finance under Édouard Daladier. The Sudeten Crisis, which began not long after Reynaud was named Minister of Justice, again revealed the divide between Reynaud and the rest of the Alliance Démocratique; Reynaud adamantly opposed abandoning the Czechs to the Germans, while Flandin felt that allowing Germany to expand eastward would inevitably lead to a conflict with the Soviets that would weaken both. Reynaud publicly made his case, and in response Flandin pamphleted Paris in order to pressure the government to agree to Hitler’s demands.[1]:519 Reynaud subsequently left his party to become an independent. Reynaud still had Daladier’s support, however, whose politique de fermeté was very similar to Reynaud’s notion of deterrence.

Reynaud, however, had always wanted the Finance ministry. He endorsed radically liberal economic policies in order to draw France’s economy out of stagnation, centered on a massive program of deregulation, including the elimination of the forty-hour work week.[1]:503 The notion of deregulation was very popular among France’s businessmen, and Reynaud believed that it was the best way for France to regain investors’ confidence again and escape the stagnation its economy had fallen into. The collapse of Léon Blum’s government in 1938 was a response to Blum’s attempt to expand the regulatory powers of the French government; there was therefore considerable support in the French government for an alternative approach like Reynaud’s.”


See Also: The Kaufman and Morgenthau Plans to Exterminate the Germans prior to, during and after WW II

Posted in Books, Fascism, Germany, Israel, National Socialism, New World Order, World War II, Zionism | Tagged , , , , , , ,

Frau Ursula Haverbeck: Where were the 6 Million Killed? (The ARD Panorama Interview, with English Subtitles)

Haverbeck - PanoramaSeveral months ago, I published two articles and videos featuring the words of Frau Ursula Haverbeck, a brave, elderly German lady who lived in National Socialist Germany under Adolf Hitler and who had survived both the war and the aftermath. Based upon the now known facts, she had publicly challenged various departments of the FRG/BRD government as well as the council of Jews in Germany to explain where the so-called “Holocaust” of the Jews took place.

In April 2015, I became aware that Frau Haverbeck had also been interviewed on a German, mainstream, public television program called “Panorama” concerning her views, the facts she is aware of, and her motives. It was amazing for this to be broadcast to the general public in occupied Germany on ARD (national TV), with its Nuremberg inspired draconian laws concerning “holocaust denial”, “defaming the victims” and “inciting the public”.  Moreover, this one hour long interview was, surprisingly, not particularly “hostile” either. It also would have reached a huge live TV audience.

At that time I first viewed it, it was only available in the German language. Now, however,  thanks to an anonymous person’s hard work, very accurate English sub-titles have been added, and so I am very pleased to be able to present this to my readers, and to help raise greater awareness of  this courageous lady and the issues she brings to the table.

NOTE: please click on the CC button at the bottom of the video frame to see the English subs.

Further to this, in a recent e-mail received from Prof. Robert Faurisson, he stated: “[the following] 10-page article provides information on an argument that is important for those who, like any revisionist researcher worthy of the name, care about historical EXACTITUDE.

In the case of the most ordinary of crimes, justice and police officials know that a forensic examination is absolutely indispensable. However, for seventy years, in the case of what is reputed to be the most atrocious crime ever by its nature and its proportions, that of “the Holocaust” or “the Shoah”, the judges have dispensed with any medico-legal study conducted under the rules established by law and observed by good judicial practice.

There has been just one exception: in France, a forensic examination of the alleged Nazi gas chamber in the Struthof camp near Strasbourg was ordered shortly after the war and assigned to Professor René Fabre, Dean of the Paris faculty of pharmacy and a toxicologist. On December 1, 1945 the professor came to a negative conclusion: he had found no traces of hydrocyanic acid where such traces ought to have been discovered, i.e. in the enclosure called “gas chamber” and in the exhaust stack of that enclosure; nor were there any such traces in the corpses left by the Germans at the University of Strasbourg’s institute of anatomy, corpses of Jews alleged to have been gassed by the camp commandant, Josef Kramer, alone, without the assistance of a single gas specialist. Lacking any training in chemistry, J. Kramer was, in civilian life, a simple accountant! The report by Professor Fabre has vanished but I personally discovered, in 1980, a document certifying the results of his study. Even Jean-Claude Pressac admitted that Fabre’s findings were negative:

“The result [of toxicological testing for traces of cyanide] at Struthof was negative, which was somewhat embarrassing” (The Struthof Album, Edited by Serge Klarsfeld, [published by] The Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, New York, 1985, p. 12).” ”

You may read the full 10 page article here:

Posted in Activism, Germany, holocaust, News, Revisionism, Video, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Liberating Dachau From 70 Years of Allied Propaganda

Dachau BookThe following are excerpts from a very lengthy article published by the IHR in 1989, entitled Lessons from Dachau, by John Cobden, in which he reviewed the book DACHAU: 1933-45, THE OFFICIAL HISTORY by Paul Berben. London: The Norfolk Press, 1975, Hardcover, 300 pages. The book is still in print and available on Amazon.  The article is far too long to re-post in its entirety within a single blog post, however, I hope this will provide a decent overview of the contents and inspire the reader to further explore the facts presented. Mr Cobden wrote:

“Sometimes important “revisionist” works are produced, not by the revisionists, but by believers in the “exterminationist” view. A case in point is Arno Mayer’s Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?, which downplays Auschwitz as a center of gassings and admits that most deaths in the camps, including the so-called “death camps,” were the result of “natural” causes and not from gassings or executions. Another book that, remarkably, helps the revisionist case is Paul Berben’s Dachau: 1933-45, The Official History. It begins by positing that Dachau was an “extermination camp,” then implicitly demolishes its own thesis. Berben’s Dachau was first published in 1968 in Belgium, then republished by the Norfolk Press in 1975 “on behalf and under the auspices of the Comité International de Dachau.” The C.I.D. represents the tens of thousands of deportees who were exterminated in the death camp and also those who survived.” (p. xiv) It is incontestably an official history: the 1975 edition, which is reviewed in this article, contains the statement that it was “published for sale only at the Dachau Camp Memorial Site.”


NOTE: This, chart reprinted from page 281 of Berben’s “Dachau,” illustrates some interesting facts. Note that the death rate in Dachau fell slightly in 1942. In 1943 the death rate fell almost 50 per cent. In 1943 the death rate was at an all-time low, yet according to “exterminationist theory” the “final solution” should have been in full swing. In 1944, with the reappearance of typhus in the camp, deaths rose dramatically. Note that 66 per cent of all deaths at Dachau took place in the last seven months. It should also be noted that in the winter months of 1942-43 another typhus outbreak hit the camp. There is also an unusually high number of deaths for March 1944, due to Allied bombings of Kommandos which resulted in the deaths of 223 prisoners. (See p. 95).

Dachau Death Stats

It seems very unlikely that many men in this group (even after thousands had been transferred for various reasons out of Dachau, there were still 759 criminals in the camp on April 26, 1945) were there because they were fighters for human rights.

It also seems unlikely that many of the political prisoners, especially the Communists, were advocates of individual rights. In light of the atrocities committed by Communists throughout Europe and Asia from 1917 to 1945, and beyond, it is certainly naive at best, and a lie at worst, to paint these people as freedom fighters. Yet most of the prisoners in the camp were political prisoners, of whom a large percentage were Communists or Communist sympathizers. A camp census taken on April 26,1945 showed that 43,401 prisoners were there for political reasons. In contrast, the number of Jews in the camp was 22,100; 128 prisoners had been purged from the Wehrmacht; 110 were incarcerated for being homosexual; 85 were Jehovah’s Witnesses; and 1,066 were classed as “anti-socials.” (p. 221)

What of “the tens of thousands of deportees who were exterminated in the death camp,” according to the author’s claims? In the first place, Berben, while alleging that there was a homicidal gas chamber at Auschwitz, states at the outset that “the Dachau gas-chamber was never used.” (p. 8) Like virtually all “exterminationist” writers who claim that the Dachau “gas chamber” was never completed, or completed but never used, Berben neither offers believable evidence that there actually was such an installation at Dachau, nor explains why numerous Dachau inmates swore that thousands had been gassed in it.

Dachau does, nonetheless, offer a precise figure for deaths during the war years at Dachau. According to a chart (p. 281), the number of deaths at the main Dachau camp and its smaller outstations totalled 27,839 for the years from 1940 through 1945 (again, the claim that some 238,000 inmates perished at Dachau, once exhibited on a sign at the entrance to the camp, is passed over by Berben in silence).

An analysis of this figure affords some interesting insights. Of the 27,839, 2,226 are said to have died in May 1945, after the Americans liberated the camp. In other words, fully eight per cent of the wartime deaths at Dachau took place in a month that the camp was in the hands of Allied forces.

If one were disposed to citing such figures without regard to their context (that is, disregarding the reason for the deaths), a damaging case against the American occupiers could be made. According to the figures Berben provides, during the 65 months from January 1940 to May 1945 27,839 prisoners died from all causes, working out to an average of 428 per month (see Chart 1). During the first month of Allied control of Dachau, therefore, the death rate was 400 per cent higher than average.

Doubtless someone who felt compelled to defend the American “liberators” of Dachau would quickly establish, and argue, that the cause of death was not an American extermination program, but the continuation of the contagion which had racked Dachau in the months before the camp’s capture at the end of April 1945. Exactly! Dachau fell prey to a devastating epidemic (of chiefly typhus) from the end of 1944. From November of that year through May 1945, 18,296 inmates died, 66 per cent of the deaths during the war years. If one includes the deaths which took place from November 1943 to March 1944 (another epidemic), the number of the victims rises to 19,605, or 70 per cent of the wartime victims.

If the figures in the official history are correct, and deaths during epidemics taken into account, we are left with 8,234 possible victims of extermination. But Berben makes it quite clear that sickness and disease was a constant problem, and that many people died year in, year out of such natural causes. He also points out that numerous individuals committed suicide, that some prisoners believed to be working for the Nazis were murdered by fellow prisoners, and that some were killed in Allied bombings. Bergen notes that in March 1944 one Allied bombing of a factory where prisoners worked killed 223 prisoners. In another case a tunnel collapsed in a factory, killing 22 prisoners. An Allied bombing at the same site later killed an additional 6. These two incidents alone account for another 251 deaths in the camp, almost one percent of the total deaths. Bergen also claims that some executions took place, mostly by firing squad. But these executions only account for a very small percentage of the deaths in the camps about .0087 per cent (p. 271)

Berben also notes that Himmler wanted to lower the death rate in the camps as much as possible, which seems odd if the extermination of prisoners was the goal.

The death-rate in the camps forced the S.S. to take notice. With the help of copious statistics they watched its progress, not to save human lives, but to economize on man-power. On 30th September 1943 Pohl informed Himmler that the number of deaths in August was 40 out of an average work force of 17,300, that is 0.23 per cent, whereas the previous month the percentage had been 0.32 per cent They had achieved a reduction of 0.09. Results were obtained from other camps too. Out of a total strength estimated at 224,000 in August, there had been 4,699 deaths, that is 2.09 per cent, compared with 2.23 per cent in July: the improvement was therefore 0.14 per cent. Himmler congratulated Pohl on the results he had obtained even though they were difficult to check! (p. 94-95)”

What one finds in this official history of Dachau is not confirmation of the “exterminationist” view, but a repudiation of it. It is quickly evident that a very high percentage of the total deaths can be accounted for in terms other than an “extermination.” While we don’t know how many of the remaining non-epidemic deaths fell into “natural” categories, we can rationally assume that many of them were caused by disease, accidents, suicides, and natural causes. The last category is important because Dachau housed quite a few older prisoners. “Statistics made by the camp administration on 16th February 1945 list 2,309 men and 44 women aged between 50 and 60 and 5,465 men and 12 women over 60.” (p. 11) This admission is rather significant, since, according to general “exterminationist” theory, older prisoners often were not even admitted to the camps, but were separated from the other prisoners immediately upon arrival, then gassed. At a camp which its official survivors’ committee calls a “death camp,” however, we find 2,910 prisoners of advancing years who had evidently not been exterminated.

The “exterminationist” view, either that focusing on the Jews or the broader version, has long told us that, like the elderly, children were singled out for death immediately, because they were incapable of working. Dachau, however, also housed an unstated number of children. Berben states that a group of prisoners formed an unofficial governing body, called the International Committee, and that this group started a school in the camp for the children.

As has already been mentioned, there were times when even children were imprisoned in Dachau. The International Committee saw to it that they were not abandoned. A school was organized for Russian children under a Yugoslavian teacher, and the older ones were placed in Kommandos [subsidiary work camps of Dachau] where they were looked after by prisoners who tried not only to keep them in good health but to teach them the rudiments of a trade as well (p. 175).

While the older children were old enough to work, it is unlikely that the younger children in the school were doing so. Thus, according to the “exterminationist” view, they too should have been immediately killed.

An important component of the “extermination” theory is the notion that prisoners not killed immediately were subject to “extermination through work,” in which brutal on-the-job drudgery and miserable living conditions made the life in the camps nasty and short. Under a regime intent on the death of all Jews and other “undesirables” we would expect very little food, medical care, and other necessities to be available to the prisoners. There would certainly be no orders to lower the death rate, just as there would be no elderly or sick prisoners sitting around: Those capable of working would work; the others would have been put to death, the sooner the better. But, as described in this official history, at Dachau the Germans were intent on keeping the prisoners alive, even the sick and the elderly.

[ …]

Living conditions in the camp didn’t suddenly worsen as a result of a decision to exterminate. For most of the camp’s history conditions were fairly good, considering that it served as a type of prison. Berben quotes Wolfgang Jasper, legation counselor and member since 1935 of an S.S. cavalry unit

We found the camp [in 1937] and the huts in faultless condition and perfectly clean. The prisoners made a very good impression on us and did not seem to be at all hungry. They were allowed to receive letters and parcels and had a canteen where they could buy things. There were also cultural activities available. (p. 43)


“In addition to regularly scheduled meals and the second breakfast, and what prisoners could purchase at the canteen, other food was available as well. “From the end of 1942, however, large consignments of food and other useful things did reach the camp … ” Family and friends of prisoners were sending parcels of food into the camp. In addition to these parcels, “The consignments sent to the Red Cross also brought assistance whose beneficial efforts cannot be over-emphasized.” Berben said that the Red Cross shipments alone consisted of “thousands” of parcels. Dachau served as the main camp for all prisoners who were clergy, about 2,700 prisoners. According to Berben:

Food parcels could be sent to clergy and the food situation improved noticeably. Germans and Poles particularly received them in considerable quantities from their families, their parishioners and members of religious communities. In Block 26 one hundred sometimes arrived on the same day. (p. 151)

The clergy continued to receive the “considerable quantities” of food until nearly the end of the war.

This period of relative plenty lasted till the end of 1944 when the disruption of communications stopped the dispatch of parcels. Nevertheless the German clergy continued to receive food through the Dean of Dachau, Herr Pfanzelt, to whom the correspondents sent food tickets: the priest brought bread and sausage with these and sent the parcels by the local post. (p. 151)

Thus Berben, while lamenting the lack of food, tells us that prisoners had regular meals, some had a second breakfast, that “large consignments” were mailed to prisoners, that Thousands” of parcels arrived from the Red Cross, that food could be purchased at the canteen, that the clergy received “considerable quantities” from parishioners and that this “period of relative plenty lasted till the end of 1944.” All of this came to an end, not because the Nazis decided to starve people, but because “the disruption of communications stopped the dispatch of parcels.” Yet, in spite of these admissions that large quantities of food were available to the average prisoner, Berben says that “legitimate means of obtaining extras were available to only a limited number of privileged prisoners.” (pp. 164-165)

Berben tells us at length how the National Socialist government continually expanded medical services throughout the war. He notes that when the camp was first built in 1933 very few medical services were available. But as the camp was expanded, a hospital was included:

… Blocks A and B: they consisted of an operating theatre with modern equipment. Visitors were invariably shown these buildings, because they proved “the interest taken by the S.S. in the prisoners health.” (p. 104) As the war progressed the demand for health services in the camp increased. In 1940 the hospital was extended to Blocks 1, 3 and 5. But it was mainly from 1942 onwards that increasing numbers caused the sick block to be extended: in September of that year it comprised 7 blocks, one of which had no wards and was reserved for offices, the pharmacy, the laboratory and the rooms occupied by the experimental departments. In the second half of 1944, the seven blocks were linked by a long closed corridor, and then the three blocks. 11 to 15. were added … (p. 104)

The hospital care given to prisoners is praised continually in Berben’s official history.

The accommodation was complete and modern, and in normal conditions specialists could have treated all the diseases efficiently. Operations were performed in two well-equipped theatres. The laboratory was well appointed, and all the necessary analyses could be made there until, at the end of 1944, the service was overwhelmed. There was an electrocardiograph and the very latest model of a Siemens X-ray apparatus. (p. 104)

The author states that the increase in hospital service was beneficial to the prisoners.

The effect of these changes on the prisoners situation was beneficial. Generally speaking, there was good understanding between the doctors and prisoner-nurses, and their co-operation achieved good results. Thanks to the doctors’ initiative, backed up by the nurses and with the help of workmen, a special hut was built between Blocks 11 and 13 for the tuberculosis patients to take open-air cures. Sputum was examined in the laboratory and most of those prisoners in whom it was found to give a positive reaction were hospitalized and treated by rest and fresh-air cures and given extra rations. (p. 106)

Dachau: The Official History makes clear that the camp officials attempted to keep disease to a minimum. They attempted to enforce certain hygiene standards, which of course became increasingly difficult as the war progressed. Berben writes:

It is obvious that in a camp where thousands of men live in a far too confined area and in deplorable conditions very strict hygiene was vital. In the early years, when numbers were still relatively low and arrivals were in small groups, adequate precautions could be taken. “The newcomers went to the showers, were cropped, given clothes and underwear, wretched, it is true, but laundered.” The rooms were not overcrowded. The orders concerning the upkeep of the premises, clothing and bodily cleanliness were irksome and prompted the bullying of prisoners, but all in all they were useful because the vast majority of the prisoners realized that if they were to stand any chance of survival they would have to conform to strict rules. They knew that they could of course expect nothing from the camp authorities; when hygienic precautions were laid down, it was merely to protect the S.S. staff and to have the maximum labour force. (p. 109)

Even a cursory read of Dachau: The Official History shows that conditions were fairly decent and only fell apart near the end of the war, when all of Germany was in chaos.




Military Police Service (Austria) circular from 1948 confirms no one was killed by poison gassings at any of the here mentioned KZs (Concentration Camps), including Dachau, and adds that it is proven that any admissions to alleged gassings in these camps were derived from torture, and furthermore, that witness statements alleging gassings were false. This document was accepted as evidence by the EU Commission for Human Rights in a case involving an Austrian who was charged under holocaust denial laws, and he was exonerated, while German Revisionist Historian Udo Walendy was not.

No gassings

Posted in Books, Germany, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , ,

70 Years of Unrelenting Smear Campaigns and Demonization of an Entire People are Enough – R.I.P. Reinhold Elstner

Reinhold Elstener2

On April 25th, 1995 Reinhold Elstner, a 75 year-old veteran of the Second World War, walked up to the steps of Munich’s historical Feldherrnhalle, doused himself in gasoline and set himself on fire to protest against what he called “the ongoing official slander and demonization of the German People and German soldiers 50 years after the end of World War II”.

In his parting letter he wrote:

“Fifty years of unrelenting smear campaigns and demonization of an entire people are enough.

Fifty years of incessant insults hurled at German war veterans are enough.

With my 75 years of age, all I can do is to set a final sign of contemplation with my death in flames. And if only one German comes to consciousness and finds his way to the truth, then my sacrifice will not have been in vain.”

Here is the complete text of Reinhold Elstner’s last letter, translated by Hans Schmidt:


In Germany, in Austria, in Switzerland, and everywhere else in the world: Please awaken!

50 years of never-ending defamation, ugly lies and the demonization of an entire people are enough,

50 years of incredible insults to former German soldiers, of blackmail that costs billions, and of “democratic” hate, are more than one can take,

50 years of judicial Zionist revenge are sufficient,

50 years of trying to create rifts between generations of Germans by criminalizing the fathers and grandfathers are too much.

It is incredible what we have to take in this anniversary year. A Niagara-like flood of lies and defamations inundates us. Since I am now 75 years of age, I cannot do much anymore but I can still seek death by self-immolation; one last deed that may act as a signal to the Germans to regain their senses. Even if through my deed only one German will awaken, and because of it will find the way to the truth, then my sacrifice will not have been in vain.

I felt I had no other choice after I realized that now, after 50 years, there seems a little hope that reason would gain the upper hand. As someone who was driven from his home after the war, I always had one hope, that that which was granted the Israelis after 2,000 years, namely the right to return to “home” would also be granted German expellees. What happened to the promise of self-determination that was promulgated in 1919, when millions of Germans were forced to live under foreign rule? To this day we have to suffer from these wrongs, and I can state that it wasn’t the Germans who can be held responsible for it.

I am a Sudeten German. I had a Czech grandmother, and from the other side Czech and Jewish relatives, some of whom had been incarcerated in concentration camps like Buchenwald, Dora (Nordhausen) and Theresienstadt. I never belonged either to the Nazi party or even to any other group that was in the slightest tainted by the association with national socialism. We always had the best of relationship with our non-German kin, and, when necessary, we helped each other. During the war, our food market with bakery was responsible for the distribution of food stuffs to the French POWs and Ostarbeiter living in the town. Everyone was dealt with fairly, and this assured that at war’s end our business was not plundered because the French POWs guarded it until they were repatriated to their own country. Our relatives who had been prisoners in the concentration camps came already home on the 10th of May, 1945 (two days after the hostilities had ceased), and offered their help. Of special assistance was the Jewish uncle from Prague who in the Czech capital had seen the horrible blood bath Czech partisans had caused among the Germans left there. The horror of these cold-blooded killings could still be seen in the man’s eyes, obviously a horror the likes of which this former prisoner of the Reich had not experienced during his incarceration.

I was a soldier of the Wehrmacht of the Greater German Reich, fighting, from day one on the Eastern front. To this one must add a few years of slave work as a POW in the Soviet Union.

I well remember the Kristallnacht of 1938 because on that day I met a crying Jewish girl, a girl with whom I had been studying. But I was much more shocked when I saw in Russia how all churches had been desecrated, how they were used for stables and machine shops; I saw the pigs grunt, sheep bleat, machines hammering in holy places. Yet, for me the worst was when I saw churches being used as museums for atheism. And all this occurred with the active connivance of the Jews, that very small minority of which so many members were the executing goons of Stalin. Foremost amongst these people was the Kaganovich clan, seven brothers and sisters, who were such mass murderers that alleged SS-killers can be called harmless by comparison.

After I was permitted to go “home” after my discharge from Russian POW camps (what a mockery to say to go “home” to a POW who has been expelled from his ancestral homeland), I heard for the first time of the brutalities of the German concentration camps but at first nothing of any gas chambers and of the killing of human beings through the use of poison gas. On the contrary, I was told that the concentration camps at Theresienstadt and Buchenwald (Dora) even had bordellos for the inmates within the confines of the camp. Then, on the occasion of the “Auschwitz trials”, and not only at the Nürnberg trials, Herr Broszat of the “Institute for Modern History” stated that the famous “six million” figure is only a symbolic number. In spite of the fact that Herr Broszat had also declared that there had been no gas chambers used for the killing of human beings in any camps on German Reich soil, for years alleged gas chambers were shown to visitors at Buchenwald, Dachau, Mauthausen, and the like. Lies, nothing but lies to this day.

Everything became very clear to me when I read dozens of books written by Jews and so-called anti-fascists. In addition, I was able to draw upon my own experience in Russia. I lived for two years in the hospital town of Porchov, where already in the first winter the danger of typhus epidemic arose, and all the hospitals and first-aid stations were deloused with what we called then “K.Z.Gas” (concentration camp gas), namely “Zyklon-B”. There I learned how dangerous it was to handle this poison gas even though I did not belong to the teams that defumigated the buildings. At any rate, ever since then I have had no choice but to regard all concentration camp memoirs that describe the alleged “gas chambers” as fairy tales. This may be the real reason why all concentration camp reports (by the victims, the translator) are being accepted as true under a so-called “Judicial notice” and need not to be proven.

In 1988 the German TV brought a report on Babi Yar (the ravine near Kiev in the Ukraine, the translator) where it was stated that the SS had killed 36,000 Jews by stoning them. Three years later, a Mrs. Kayser wrote a report for the newspaper “TZ” in Munich stating that these Jews had been killed by shooting, and that their bodies had then been burned in the deep crevasses. Asked about it, Dr. Kayser pointed to a bookstore in Konstanz that sells the book “Shoa at Babi Yar”. On the day that book arrived at my home, the German TV brought a report from Kiev telling of the findings of a Ukrainian commission: at Babi Yar where the remains of about 180,000 murdered human beings, all killed on orders of Stalin (before 1941, the translator). The Germans were not responsible at all. But everywhere in the world one can still find Babi Yar monuments blaming the Germans for the killings there. (Note by the translator: President Clinton visited Babi Yar on 10 May 1995, and spoke, in front of a menorah, of the Jews the Germans had allegedly killed there. An outright lie.)

Due to the facts as told by Herr Broszat, that we had been lied about the occurrences in a dozen concentration camps, I myself am unwilling to believe the fairy tales that are being told about the alleged happenings in the camps in Poland. I also do not believe the postwar accusations that we Germans are particularly aggressive. After all, it was Germany that kept the peace from 1871 to 1914, while England and France, the foremost democracies, conquered most of Africa and expanded their colonies in Asia. At the same America fought Spain and Mexico, and Russia battled Turkey and Japan. In these matters I consider the government of the United States particular cynical since it was that country which twice this century crossed the ocean to attack Germany and turn us towards “democracy”. One must consider that this was a government whose nation eradicated the original inhabitants, and to this day treats its black population as second class citizens.

During my years I met nice and helpful Jews not only among my relatives but also as a POW in Russia. In Gorki a female Jewish professor helped me back to health when I suffered from pleurisy and severe eye problems. But I also had heard many bad things about this small minority. Did not Churchill write in the London Sunday Herald ( 8 February 1920) as follows:

“From the days of the Spartakus Weishaupt to Marx, Trotzky, Bela Khun, Rosa Luxembourg and Emma Goldmann, there is a worldwide conspiracy busy to destroy our civilization, and to change our society on the basis of unhampered developments of ugly greed, and an impossible dream of equality of all. This conspiracy with its relentless undermining of every existing institution was able to engage a gang of unscrupulous people from the underworld of the larger cities of Europe and America to take over Russia, and make itself masters of this large empire. It is not necessary to overestimate the role which these godless Jews played in the establishment of Bolshevism.”
I hope I am entitled to quote the recipient of the prestigious German Karls-Prize. [With this sentence Mr. Elstner alluded to the fact that in “free” and “democratic” Germany there are now many taboos in force, particularly in the political and historical fields. Even quoting Churchill’s sentences from 1920 may land a person in jail for “inciting hate against another group”, namely, the Jews. The truth of a statement is no defense. — The translator].

In the XVIIIth Century, Samuel Johnson wrote: “I am not certain what we should fear more, a street full of soldiers who are out to plunder, or a room full of writers who are used to lie.”

Considering our experience after 1918 and after 1945, we Germans ought to know what we have to fear most!

Munich, 25 April 1995

Reinhold Elstner

Reinhold Elstner




Rest in Peace Herr Elstner!

Your struggle is our struggle. 70 years have now past and we are confronting the lies and speaking the truth. We are no longer waiting for Truth and Justice for Germans, we demand it!

PS Thank you to Paul Eisen and Prof. Robert Faurisson for the info!

Posted in Activism, Germany, National Socialism, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Hail to them who truly liberated Germany! Woe unto the enslavers and the traitors!

liberation memorial plaqueIF the ALL LIES had really wanted to “liberate” Germany, they should have done it in the early 1920s by rescinding the Dictates of Versailles, restoring traditional German lands and living up to the 14 points of Woodrow Wilson. The continuation of this policy of ANTI-GERMAN HATRED, GENOCIDAL REPARATIONS, THEFT OF TERRITORY, and FOREIGN INTRUSION into Germany’s political life and cultural affairs not only paved the way for Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP, it NECESSITATED National Socialism for the very survival of the German people and the defence of essential German “Lebensraum“. Only genocidal maniacs and global bullies did not want that. Hail to them who truly liberated Germany! Woe unto those who not only re-enslaved Germany, and in so doing, also enslaved themselves and all of humanity.

Only cowards, traitors and puppets who do the bidding of the ultimate victors (the International Bankster Gangsters) would celebrate their enslavement and call it “liberation” and partake of their victor’s lies, and likewise, would fail to honour their own fallen soldiers, mourn their dead and remember the many millions who were raped, tortured, starved, looted and expelled from their native lands. Shame on them!

Carl Theodor Koerner

A favourite poem of the late, great Hans Krampe



Posted in Germany, Word War I, World War II | Tagged , , , , , ,