86 Year Old German Woman lays charges against the Central Council of the Jews in Germany

Ursula HaverbeckHere is a story you won’t hear in the “mainstream media” nor the alternative, unless it is first put through the wash and spin cycle. Thus,  I will do my best to simply translate and present this important and very newsworthy story to the world for consideration as provided by the original author, whom I shall introduce, as well as provide some context for her perspective, as well as my own.

Frau Ursula Haverbeck, born in 1928,  is an 86 year old survivor of the genocidal Allied terror bombing, the Russian onslaught of rape and pillage on Germany’s Eastern frontier, the anti-German pogroms and expulsions, and the post-war Morgenthau Plan of mass starvation perpetrated against Germany, the enslavement and mass murder of surrendered German soldiers as well as, of the post-war cultural genocide of the German nation by the criminal victors.

Many today still live in “denial” of these obvious and provable crimes, but no law prevents anyone from voicing their denial, so no one has ever been jailed for denying these facts. Nor is any notion of “collective guilt and punishment” forced upon the citizens of the nations which perpetrated these monstrous “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity”. The peoples of the Allied nations have not been divided, and had their land, culture and heritage stolen. Nor have they been forced to pay reparations to the Germans for this “Unholicaust”.  No one has ever been jailed for spreading “false news” and “inciting hatred” toward the German people, though it is committed daily in the mass media;  in books, films, TV shows, newspaper articles, schools, and in everyday average conversation amongst people everywhere.

Frau Haverbeck is a very learned, lucid and articulate lady, who is in good physical and mental health. She holds several university degrees, including in the field of Education. She, along with her late husband (a professor and former Eastern Front soldier) were both, in past years, very involved with environmental concerns in Germany, and were activists for the preservation of the German language and culture.

On November 20th, 2014, Frau Haverbeck made history by laying criminal charges against the Central Council of the Jews in Germany, under S. 344 of German Penal Code with “False Prosecutions” perpetrated against innocent Germans concerning their “denial of the holocaust” (TM).  The crime of False Prosecution is punishable with up to 10 years imprisonment.

In this recent video entitled “The Biggest Problem of Our Time”, she cited the ever diminishing publicly acknowledged numbers of Jews who died at Auschwitz, as already acknowledged by official sources, and which can also be read by all on the plaque outside the former Auschwitz camp.

She referred to an article to this effect in the nationally published magazine “Der Spiegel” in 2002.  Frau Haverbeck also stated that original NS German documents concerning the exact orders pertaining to the duties at Auschwitz which had been seized by the Soviet Union after the war, were now in possession of the mainstream “Institut für Zeitgeschicht” (Institute for History), and also available to the public for a fee of €124.00 since 2000.

Frau Haverbeck says that “these documents indicate very clearly, in full detail,  that the Auschwitz camp was not an ‘Extermination Camp’, but rather a ‘labour camp’ for the defence industry, and moreover, that those in charge of its operation were under orders to maintain the health of the prisoners to the best of their ability for the purposes of production, which was essential for the continuing war effort”.  She adds, “that is what those who worked there and have been accused of war crimes have always maintained!”

“Surely by now” Frau Haverbeck says “an official revision which encompasses these facts should have taken place and that all  judgments made against so-called ‘deniers’ should have been overturned, as the evidence is available which supports their position, but nothing of the sort has happened. Many are still sitting in jail to this day.  This puts the onus back on the accusers who continue to claim that 6 Million Jews were exterminated, to show us where the physical evidence is that supports their claim. Where are they?”

Frau Haverbeck stated that “I and others have petitioned every possible government department and branch of justice and have provided them with these documents, and yet nothing has happened. There has been no reply!  The reason for that must be that they have no response as they have no evidence, as there was no holocaust”.

“If this was an indeed such an ‘open and shut case’ that is irrefutable, as the courts have ruled over and over again, and which they never tire of telling us, their case cannot rest upon any so-called ‘secret order’ . And for them to now have to acknowledge a drastically reduced number of victims is for them also not possible, given the alleged  singularity of this event,  as the one and the only, and the biggest and most heinous crime ever committed. Then let us consider and compare this with the ‘Rheinwiesenlager’ (Eisenhower’s Death Camps), Dresden, Hiroshima, and horrors experienced by the many millions of German expellees and refugees from the East!”

Frau Haverbeck then goes on to state that “in statements made at Nuremberg, no one testified to the presence of any gas chambers, and that confessions, particularly those of Rudolf Höss, are now well known to have been extracted through unimaginable, excruciating torture, to which anyone would have confessed to the mass murder of millions. No testimony, received by such means,  as legal experts know, can be given consideration. Why is it that there should even be such a law as S. 130 that should deny us the ability to question this? And how is it that the entire body of defence testimony and uncountable volume of physical evidence which they tried to provide was completely ignored or destroyed? Such could only have proved to have been incriminating if something sinister had actually taken place. Obviously, they (the prosecutors) could prove nothing, and so these witnesses and their evidence had to disappear.”

She goes on to question how this is possible in Germany for the authorities to ignore, and asks whose interests these “authorities” and “academics” etc truly serve? (This roughly the first 10 minutes of the 19 minute long video. I’ll leave it there in the interest of time and length.)

In a statement posted on her website, Frau Haverbeck writes:

“After weeks of reading on the internet that ‘there was no Holocaust’ all processes in which critical-thinking citizens convicted of Holocaust denial under section 130, paragraph 3 of the Criminal Code must now be re-opened .

These citizens have committed no other crime other than that they came to the same conclusions earlier, that there may not have been any such “holocaust”, because of their own due diligence and scientific knowledge.

All interested parties should immediately consult the competent courts in order to make them now aware of this new evidence. Then, contact their respective lawyers to clarify as to how to proceed.

It was outrageous what took place after the reduction of the number of victims of Auschwitz, which was officially announced to the public, with no explanation, nor apology for giving false information.  Whereas, the ‘Spiegel’  Editor, who wrote the same thing in an essay based upon the new archival discoveries, etc., has gone unpunished.

Even more serious and incompatible with the rule of law was the simultaneous arrest and jailing of the chemist Germar Rudolf.  He had, with his chemistry expertise and his scientific investigations into Zyklon B as a potential gassing agent, come to the conclusion that the holocaust, as hitherto described, could not have happened at Auschwitz.

Now this is unacceptable: on the one side, the documents of the Commandant of Auschwitz show that this was a labor camp for the defence industry and not an extermination camp, yet the Ludwigsburg Central Office for prosecution of ‘National Socialist crimes’ has indicted about thirty men, now over ninety years old, on the charge that they had been involved an the extermination camp at Auschwitz, and in the murder of hundreds of thousands of people.

If the German citizen is still the supreme sovereign under the Basic Law in this Federal Republic of Germany, then each of us has a responsibility for the truth, and a right to expect that justice be done.  This is the basic responsibility of every citizen. It is, therefore, also the duty of each to also work towards the restoration of law and justice.”

Approx. 2,000 Germans are charged each year in Germany under S.130 of Penal Code for “Holocaust Denial” which is punishable with up to 5 years imprisonment and fines, and also has social penalties, as those convicted find themselves unable to work and shut out of organizations, etc. In the media they are demonized and vilified as “Neo-Nazis” and “right-wing extremists”. The term “Nazi” is, as I have previously reported, a pejorative term created by the enemies of National Socialism long before Hitler ever came to power, and it is still wielded as a weapon to this day, in Germany and elsewhere, to stifle dissent and discussion, and to incite hatred.

Frau Haverbeck, herself, has been labelled as such and has previously been charged and convicted as a “Holocaust denier” and also with “Volksverhetzung” (inciting hatred) for her efforts to speak out on behalf of the German people who to do this day are burdened with the alleged guilt of starting the war, of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the systematic mass murder of the European Jews.

Questioning any of this in “liberated” Germany is punishable with imprisonment. Presenting evidence to the contrary is not allowed. It is also forbidden in Canada and many European nations. Here is just a partial list of others (Germans and non-Germans) who have been tried, convicted, stalked, harassed and violently attacked for sharing their views and for presenting factual evidence contrary to the official and legally enforced narrative.

Quotes from Frau Havenbeck:

„Wir leben gar nicht in einer echten Demokratie, was man schon daran erkennen kann, daß alle Angst haben. Die Herrscher haben vor dem Volk Angst, deshalb gibt es Maulkorbgesetze, und das Volk hat vor den Regierenden Angst, deshalb wagt es nicht zu sagen, was es denkt.“ ~ Ursula Haverbeck vor dem Landgericht Dortmund, 11. Juni 2007

Translation: “We do not live a real democracy, which one can easily see when everyone lives in fear.  The Controllers are afraid of the people, and for this reason, they have made “muzzle laws”, and so the people live in fear of those who rule over them.  Therefore. the people do not dare to speak their minds.”  ~ Ursula Havenbeck, before the State Court in Dortmund, 11th June, 2007

„Vaterland und Muttersprache bilden die Grundlage jeder völkischen Entwicklung. […] Ein Sklave, der seine Ketten nicht spürt, sehnt sich niemals nach der Freiheit.“ ~ Ursula Haverbeck als Referentin im NPD-Bürgerzentrum, März 2010

Translation: “Fatherland and Mother Tongue are the basis for any folkish (German cultural) development. […] A slave who does not realize he is in chains will never seek to free himself” ~ Ursula Havenbeck, as guest speaker of the NPD-Citizen Centre, March 2010.

Ursula Haverbeck - Warrior for Trtuh and Justice

Fighter for the Truth

 A plaque created for her by friends and supporters in GermanyUrsula Haverbeck AwardTranslation: “Ursula Haverbeck is today 85, and works tirelessly for her homeland. In recognition of her loyalty and conscientious fulfillment of her duty for the fatherland, is this certificate presented in lasting recognition. In Lügde, on the 9th of November, 2013.

ursula-haverbeck.info

Posted in Activism, genocide, Germany, holocaust, News, Video, War Crimes, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 15 Comments

1938 U.S. Census Figures Reveal High Unemployment Under Roosevelt – Parallels and Implications for Today

US Has Huge Unemployment 1938A 1938 news report on U.S. unemployment figures states: “In a partial report to President Roosevelt the census director indicated that the number of unemployed throughout the nation in the middle of November was 7,800,000 to 10,800,000 persons.”

He estimated that an additional million had been laid off since then, and that 7,800,000 had afterwards voluntarily registered, after which in a canvass of houses officials registered 1,950,000 additional persons, indicating a 72 per cent, voluntary response, upon which he based the figure of 10,800, 000. He pointed out that nearly two million women were included among those in need of employment, some of whom were doubtful.”

Source: http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/68397616

Why did the Bankster Gangsters [self-described “International Jewry”] not spend their £500,000,000 (see my previous post) on helping to put Brits, Americans and others within their economic ‘sphere of influence’ back to work by helping farmers, building roads and infrastructure, and helping mothers, rather than on the waging an economic terror war and media smear campaign against Germany, Italy and Japan? And upon bribery and threats to get western leaders to do their bidding?

Having so many unemployed and hungry Americans must have  provided a nice incentive for them to want to build bombs, bombers, fighter planes, war ships and tanks to kick start their own economy, and then to later to go off and fight the evil “Nazis” “Fascists” and “Japs” as depicted by the Wall Street Gang and their Comrades in London, Moscow and Hollywood. “The Greatest Generation”? Really?

Britain was also suffering from high unemployment with many idle hands and hungry mouths, and the cost of supporting them, while in the Soviet Union, Stalin killed off many, many millions and put still more millions in gulag slave labour camps. He also got financial support from Roosevelt to build his war machine. Germany, however, had long since put nearly 7 million unemployed people back into productive work again to rescue their economy and autonomy, and within a few years was  importing labour to fill shortages.  So, who had a motive for provoking a New World War? Who had an interest in manipulating their people to fight? Hitler, or Roosevelt and Churchill?

fdr4While many idle hands were indeed enlisted to do the “work of the devil”, it was more than just a “make work project” for the economic gain of individual nations.  It was part of a life and death struggle by and for Judeo-International High Finance and their Judeo-Freemasonic-Communistic “New World Order” agenda, as expressed first through the Dictates of Versailles, then League of Nations, and later, through the formation of the United Nations, to fight Germany and the Axis powers.  Yes, the UN is about war, not peace. Except in so far as the Bankster Gangsters had peace to do their dirty work. The Democratic leaders were their puppets and the Allied soldiers (often the unemployed) were their tools, and that tradition continues today. But it is their control of the money supply, the media, education, intelligence agencies, and of corrupt politicians and political parties, in the very ‘dumbed down’ and easily manipulated, heavily indebted (hence, compliant), democratic states which remains, by far, their greatest weapon of mass destruction  today.

If that were not the case, we might actually have “Peace on Earth”  today, instead of serial wars that are like ‘B Movies’ with the same predictable plot, and another generation of gullible and unemployed sheeple, running off to fight for their own enslavement, with the same predictable outcome of being kicked to the curb afterwards (if they return), while the rest are stuck with the bill, in the form of still more debt and interest slavery. Not to mention, for caring for the physically and spiritually wounded, and the psychologically destroyed. These are the very things, of course, which Hitler and National Socialism opposed.

Make no mistake. It was not just the Germans who were defeated in World War II. All nations who went along with the destruction of Germany lost, in many cases never having experienced bullets and bombs on their own soil. They lost in terms of their own humanity, culture, heritage,  sovereignty and solvency. But they lost in ‘slow motion’ and are perhaps only now just realizing it, and seeing the effects of it around them. The proverbial ‘frog in the slow boiling pot’, so to speak. ‘This isn’t the Britain we fought for,’ say the ‘unknown warriors’ of WWII.

This insane path can only lead to an inevitable global economic and cultural collapse, mass unemployment, chaos, starvation, disease and World War III, for the fulfillment of Bankster’s satanic NWO agenda. And, in my opinion, only World War II Truth can possibly stop this juggernaut. What I am doing here with this blog is not a hobby. It is activism, and it is not without personal risk and sacrifice. I will not let the blood, the suffering and ‘holocaust’ of my people, the Germans, be forgotten, nor be in vain. The blood of countless millions of people, of all nations, races, cultures, creeds and faiths, and the complete and permanent enslavement of the remnant will not be upon my head.

We cannot wait for our corrupt leaders, academia and the media to finally tell the truth of their own accord. Nor for that matter, those in the alternative media which maintain the same narrative as the mainstream regarding Hitler, National Socialism and World War II.  No hero is going to come along and do it all for us either, nor save us after the fact.  We must prepare for what’s coming personally and for our families in various ways including stocking up on storable food and household necessities, as well as an alternative form of currency, such as Karatbars, as I have suggested. Not to mention, spiritually! Your choice.

But if we have integrity, and we care for our fellow man, our nations and this world, we must also be accountable for the sharing of information by ‘being the media’. We must take responsibility for the “final solution” to the Bankster Gangsters: An informed public which no longer stands for lies, wars and injustice, which holds its leaders and the media accountable, refuses to go along to get a long, refuses eternal debt slavery, and demands a form of government that truly serves the interests of its people, and thereby, preserves our peoples, rather than enslaves and destroys them.

That is not a call to violence, but a call to conscience, honour, integrity, dignity, and to responsible action. Nor is it a call to hatred, except insofar, as we should hate lies, distortions, wars, injustice, the enslavement and the destruction of our nations, peoples, cultures and the world which we ALL live in, and no longer tolerate it, or wilfully be a party to it. Indeed, that should be a labour of LOVE and RESPECT for our fellow man, and for our Creator, God Almighty. It requires sacrifice. That is what National Socialism was all about, and yes, it was Christian. Deal with it! Let us not be as Cain, shrug our shoulders, and ask our Father “Am I my brother’s keeper?” Gen 4:9

Otherwise, we must instead prepare ourselves for the satanic Bankster Gangster’s (Babylon) “final solution” for all humanity. What they twice did to Germany is now reserved for the rest of mankind. Wait for it!

John 8:44  (KJV)
44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Revelation 2:9 (KJV)
“I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan.”

Revelation 3:9  (KJV)
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

Revelation 6:8 King James Version (KJV)
And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

Hitler vs the New World Order

Hitler vs the New World Order

Posted in England, Germany, News, USA, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

1938 News Report Confirms International Jewish Banker Financial War Aims

Financial War Planned Against Anti-Semitic States 1938 - The Worker, Brisbane, Qld, Tuesday 4 January 1938“INTERNATIONAL JEWRY – Financial War Planned Against Anti-Semitic States £500,000,000 Fund to be Raised

‘Jewry, faced with persecution in Poland, Rumania, Germany, Austria, and elsewhere, intends to hit back,’ says the ‘Sunday Chronicle,’ according to a cable dated London, January 2.

‘The battle will be fought on the world’s stock exchanges. Most of the anti-Semitic States are burdened with debts, and they may find their very existence threatened.

‘The leaders of international Jewry will meet in a village near Geneva this week to plan a fund of £500,000, 000 with which to fight the persecutors of Jewish financiers in all parts of the world.

‘No difficulty is expected in raising such a fund, which, combined with a trade boycott, will enable the launching a counter-offensive, in which the Jewish persecutors may be defeated.‘ “

Source: The Worker (Brisbane, Qld)
Tuesday 4 January 1938

http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article71357095

Now we know who “International Jewry” (aka Judea) really is by their own admission. We can also see that their “financial war” had nothing to do with alleged discrimination or persecution of average Jews in Germany or other nations.  It was “persecution of Jewish financiers” that they were concerned with. This is the same gang that declared war on Germany in 1933 when the National Socialists first came to power. Why? Because Hitler and NSDAP opposed predatory Jewish International Free Market Capitalism as a very destructive force, and also opposed Jewish backed International Marxist Bolshevik Communism, which are to sides of the same coin.

lugeHitler defeated the Communists in Germany, kicked out the Bankster Gangsters, created a new carefully controlled currency tied directly to labour, and he placed tight controls on prices and wages, as well as on the stock markets to keep prices from being manipulated by international market speculators. As such, Germany’s currency was not part of their worldwide usury system, and they could not speculate against Germany’s Reichsmark on the financial markets.

National Socialist Germany, in particular, was managing just fine without these International Bankster Gangsters and their monopoly game, which controlled the Central Banks of the western nations, and the issuance of fiat currencies, loaned out at interest (usury), by which they have always driven nations into debt and servitude.  Yet they say, “Anti-Semitic States are burdened with debts”. Very interesting! With respect to the new Germany, that was a BIG LIE!  It seems, however, that by their own definition, an “Anti-Semitic State” is one which does not play ball with them, and it has nothing to do with concern for the lesser Jews as generally thought.

It was the western nations which were still saddled with WWI debt and were not paying it (in fact, they are still paying for that today in 2014). Unlike the Soviet Union, following the Russian Revolution, NS Germany never repudiated her WWI debt and was making good on it.  What Germany did not have was gold reserves. Those were stolen by the WWI Allies.  More on that later.  But it begs the question, why could the Allies not pay off their own war debts? Who were they in debt to? Of course, the same self-described “Jewish” International Financiers, who had the power to create currency and lend it to nations at interest, and control over their debts, and to exert great influence on the stock markets.  Obviously, those nations leaders were mere puppets and their foreign policies were catered to the bankers needs or wishes, and the same holds true today.  Not so with NS Germany!

But notice that they include “Poland” and “Rumania” here, as well as “Austria”. Why?  Rumania was not allied with Germany at this time. She was neutral.  Poland was not “allied” with Germany either, BUT they did have a “friendship pact” that was signed by Hitler and the late Marshall Pilzudski.  See: Excerpts of Hitler’s Speeches on German-Polish Peace, 1935-1939.

Moreover, Poland was riddled with inner ethnic strife and labour problems resulting from poor low wages and working conditions, not to mention unresolved border issues. Her products and raw materials such as coal were subject to the international market speculation.  How better to stir up the Poles (who were neither National Socialist nor Fascist, and therefore, under the financial influence of the Bankster Gangsters) than to threaten them with boycotts and financial ruin, and to drive down prices? Or perhaps, on the other hand, to dangle carrots of incentives in front of them, if they sided with England, and again, turned hostile towards Germany and the ethnic German minority in their country?

Rumania too was a basket case with sizable ethnic minorities, ethnic strife and border disputes with her neighbours, as well as, much coveted natural resources, especially oil. No doubt King Carol II was also ripe for financial blackmail to keep Romania neutral  ie. not side with Germany or trade with her.

Austria? Since end of World War II, the Austrian people had desired to re-join the German Reich, and even more so as Germany began to prosper under Hitler and National Socialism, while they themselves languished in debt and poverty. But the WWI Allies forbade the merger. Austrian Leader Engelbert Dollfuss also vehemently opposed it, especially after Hitler came to power in 1933. Austria too was a political and economic basket case. Dollfuss eventually dissolved parliament and became dictator. He was conservative, anti-Communist, and tried to model himself and his government on Mussolini’s Fascism, but he was assassinated in 1934. His successor followed largely in the same model. That would not have pleased the Bankster Gangsters. Unlike in Italy and Germany, the Rothschilds were still doing business in Austria, and would naturally have been more opposed to a merger with the German Reich and the expanded influence of National Socialism.  Indeed, after Austria voted to join the Reich,  the Rothschild bank in Vienna was closed with all of its assets seized by the Reich government, as I have previously noted in an older post. See: http://justice4germans.com/2012/10/13/hitler-was-a-jew-a-rothschild-really/

It should be easy to see that virtually all of Germany’s neighbours would have been subject to the same degree of heavy handed financial influence, and as such, whatever neutrality they declared or peace agreements they came to with Germany, or foreign policy they espoused, they could easily be brought to heel and to cooperate in some way, by those who controlled their money and their debt, and the markets, and who also had such great sums of money at their disposal with which to bribe the leaders.

Far fetched? “Conspiracy theory”? This came to light just a few years ago:

MI6 spent $200m bribing Spaniards in second world war

Newly released documents reveal secret services paid out fortune in bid to stop Franco joining war on Hitler’s side

MI6 spent the present-day equivalent of more than $200m bribing senior Spanish military officers, ship owners and other agents to keep Spain out of the second world war, files released today disclose.

More and more money was delivered, mainly via a Swiss bank account in New York, as Sir Samuel Hoare, Britain’s ambassador in Madrid, warned London that unless it was paid, there was a real and immediate danger of Spain abandoning its neutrality and of Franco joining forces with Nazi Germany.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/may/23/mi6-spain-200m-bribes-ww2

Hitler was extremely disappointed by the lack of Spanish support, or meagre support. Franco owed Germany. It could have made a huge difference to the defence of Europe. Now we know why it was not forthcoming..

So did  “International Jewry” come up with the £500,000,000 which they “would have no difficulty raising”, and what did they do with it?  Now I think we have a pretty good idea.  My guess is that a lot more went into international “Anti-Nazi” hate propaganda, funding various subversive groups in Germany,  inciting Anti-German hatred in Poland, as well as bribing or blackmailing other nations, and funding the Soviets.

Why didn’t these “International Jews” put their £500,000,000 into helping those oft cited (pre-war) “6,000,000” poor persecuted eastern Jews in Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Romania, and elsewhere to immigrate to Palestine, hmmm? I will let you the reader think about it and make up your own mind on that.  Why did they not put into creating much needed employment in the UK and USA? The answer should be clear, that they do not give a rat’s ass about anyone but themselves and their financial interests, and that is what was at risk, why they wanted war and did everything in their power to destroy and enslave Germany, permanently. Moreover, it was also to set a precedent for future wars. That is what is really going on when they call a nation “Anti-Semitic” or when they say, in regard to some nation’s leader who is bucking the system, “he’s another Hitler!”

I was going to end there, but please bear with me. Let’s play “follow the money”.  Interestingly,  in July of 1939, the Bank of England (The Rothschilds) tucked away gold in the same amount of £500,000,000  in preparation for war with Germany.

British secret gold vault 1939“SECRET VAULT FOR £500,000,000

Governors of the Bank of England have drawn up plans for transporting £500,000,000 of the nation’s gold reserve to a secret vault in the country in the event of war.
This vault is hundreds of miles from London, and comprises a bomb-proof safe deposit.

The convoy , will be escorted by an armed guard of both police and  soldiers.
The gold, represents Britain’s staying power — the basis on which war loans might be raised, and the purchasing power which will ensure supplies of food and raw materials, from overseas.

http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article42189468

As I alluded to earlier, Germany had NO gold, and was NOT part of the International Bankster Gangsters monopoly game. Hitler did NOT and could not print money at will as the whole financial and economic system would have quickly unravelled. Germany did NOT have access to international loans from London and New York for the purposes of war. Indeed, “International Jewry” was telling us that Hitler opposed THEM.  So, obviously he was NOT a tool of the Rothschilds, nor “a Jew”, as so many disinfo agents and their moron followers have claimed, and which I have previously debunked.

The facts are, Germany did NOT want war, nor could afford another long war, much less wars of conquest. Germany had a military that was numerically far inferior to France, Poland, Russia and the UK. Germany was being boycotted by the USA and many other countries, had no colonies from which to extract resources, only limited trade opportunities which were conducted through barter, and few sources for raw materials needed for industry and military purposes. The International Bankster Gangster (self-described “International Jewry”also deplored that barter system, as it cut them out! So, have we figured out who this war was for yet, who financed it and who benefited? And if anyone thinks that it was just Germany, Italy and Japan who lost, they could not be more wrong.

In closing, it is  interesting to note that, after the war, in 1949, there was a massive default on debt owed to Britain to the tune of  (drum roll please…..)

£500,000,000 default£500,000,000 DEFAULT

LONDON. Feb. ll.-Foreign borrowers who have defaulted in their payments of capital and interest, now owe British investors nearly £500 million. The Council of Foreign Bond holders says this in its annual report. The council protects the interests of holders of foreign government State or municipal obligations issued In Britain.  http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article63445925

Congratulations Brits.

Posted in Economics, England, financing, Germany, Hitler, News, Rothschild, World War II, Zionism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

VIDEO: Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof on ‘The War That Had Many Fathers’ with English Subtitles

Major-General Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof (ret.) talks about his groundbreaking revisionist history of the run-up to the Second World War, “The War That Had Many Fathers” (Der Krieg der viele Väter hatte). This is German with English sub-titles. Please be sure to enable “C.C.” on the YouTube video player.

This fascinating lecture has racked more than 200,000 views in various uploads on YouTube, but despite the existence of an excellent Portuguese translation, until now there has been no English version available for the rest of us. Break the spell of more than seven decades of “Allied” propaganda and try seeing the run-up to 1 September 1939 as the Germans did. The results might surprise you. Essential viewing! http://www.amazon.com/1939-War-That-M…

Note 1: According to Duff Cooper’s own account of the event, as published in his 1953 volume of memoirs “Old Men Forget,” his wife did not read the Sixteen Points, but rather heard them on the radio when they were broadcast by the BBC, belatedly, on 31 August 1939:

“On the morning of September 1st I played golf at Goodwood. I never played worse. I couldn’t concentrate on the game because I was thinking of what had happened the night before. We had listened to the eleven o’clock news and had heard the German sixteen points to Poland given out without commentary. I was horrified. And was the more horrified because Diana [his wife] hearing them said that they did not seem to her unreasonable. I tried to explain to her how they meant the end of Poland, but I felt that the reactions of millions of people might be the same as hers.

“I rang up Winston, who said he felt exactly as I did, but that he had already spoken to the Daily Mail, who were inclined to take a favorable view of the German proposals. . . . I then got on to Camrose [William Berry, Baron (later Viscount) Camrose, owner of the Daily Telegraph and other papers], who also agreed with me. . . . I urged that the Daily Telegraph should come out with a strong leading article condemning the terms.

“When we had finished our round of golf we went into the club house for a drink. Two men sitting at the bar were discussing future race-meetings. One of the two, the secretary, I knew slightly. As we left he said to me, ‘Hitler started on Poland this morning.’ . . . That was how I heard that the second World War had begun. As we drove back to Bognor my heart felt lighter than it had for a year.”

— Old Men Forget (London: Ruper Hart Davis, 1953), p. 257

Despite his faulty “staging” of the event (perhaps the result of extrapolating from secondary sources), Schultze-Rhonhof thus clearly has the gist of the story correct:  Duff Cooper—and Winston Churchill, too — were alarmed at the prospect of the British public finding the program of the Sixteen Points a reasonable alternative to war, and used their influence with the press to ensure that it be presented in as unfavorable a light as possible.

(For the original Sixteen Points, see “Documents on the Events Preceding the Outbreak of the War” http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/pre…, pp. 485-8. A recording of the 1939 BBC broadcast which Diana Cooper heard is available on the BBC site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/ww2outbr….)

Note 2: The passage from Churchill’s speech @ 33:58 is not in fact a direct quotation, but rather a loose paraphrase of his remarks taken from a secondary German source (Erich Kern, “Verheimlichte Dokumente: Was den Deutschen verschwiegen wird“). Churchill’s actual words from the most relevant part of the speech, as recorded in the Hansard transcripts, are as follows:

“The removal of the just grievances of the vanquished ought to precede the disarmament of the victors. I hope I have made that quite clear. To bring about anything like equality of armaments, if it were in our power to do so, which it happily is not, while those grievances remain unredressed, would be almost to appoint the day for another European war—to fix it as if it were a prize fight. It would be far safer to reopen questions like those of the Danzig Corridor, and Transylvania, with all their delicacy and difficulty, in cold blood and in a calm atmosphere and while the victor nations still have ample superiority, than to wait and drift on, inch by inch and stage by stage, until once again vast combinations, equally matched, confront each other face to face.”

http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/co…

Note also that the correct date for the speech is 23 (not 24) November 1932, and that it was given before the House of Commons. (Schultze-Rhonhof incorrectly states that it was an “Oberhausrede,” i.e., a speech before the [“Upper”] House of Lords.)

***

See also: Danzig and WWII

Video: 1939 German News Report on Ethnic-German Refugees from Poland

Polish Atrocities Against the German Minority in Poland (official NS Germany govt report)

100 Documents on the Origin of the War (German White Book)

What the World Rejected: Hitler’s Peace Offers 1933-1939

Video: Hitler’s War – What the Historians Neglect to Mention

Comment:  I have been aware of the great work of Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof for several years, and have mentioned him in some earlier posts. I have one of his books and had seen a number of his presentations on YouTube. Until now, these were only available in German. His work is not well known or accepted in Germany where he has been denounced by the media lackeys, politicians and court historians of the victors and occupiers as a “right-wing extremist”,  “Neo-Nazi”,  etc.  Nothing could be further from the truth. He is a man of honour and integrity, and great courage. Something which those shameful traitors and whores know NOTHING about.  In the allegedly liberated FRG/ BRD, the truth is “verboten”.  By the way, I believe that a good portion of the documentary “Hitlers Krieg – Was Guido Knopp Verschweigt (Hitler’s War – What the Historians Neglect to Mention) was also based upon Schultze-Rhonhof’s research.

I wish to thank the person who took the time to translate this presentation and to create the English sub-titles, as well as, to upload it along with the nice commentary in the description area of the video, which I have quoted verbatim above.  Thanks also to a reader Karl M. for letting me know about this. I have a number of draft posts that I have been working on, and this fits well with a few of them, and with others which I have already published.

Finally… Dankeschoen Herr Schultze-Rhonhof fuer Ihre tolle Arbeit und Bemuehungen, aber noch viel mehr fuer Ihren Mut. Sie sind ein wahrer Held des Volkes. Nur die Wahrheit wird uns letztendlich, von der Gross Luege und Schande des 20. Jahrhunderts befreien. Moege Gott Sie segnen!

J4G

Posted in Books, Churchill, England, Germany, Hitler, Poland, Policies, Versailles, Video, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

World War I: Britain’s Share of Guilt

the first casualty of war is truthAndreas van de Kamp
Staatsstreich.at
9. September 2014

For mainstream historians Britain’s declaration of war to Germany a hundred years ago was driven by dire necessity. But two recently published books are critical of this notion. The first one posits, that the war was indeed consequence of the conscious encirclement of Germany; a move that was executed by Whitehall, but masterminded by a shadowy elite in the UK. The second book does not share this point of view, but maintains that the British entry to the War was no forgone conclusion at all.

100 years after the starting shot for the XX century, hundreds of books have been published and no one still is paying attention to Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty, which was a political fabrication from the start.

“The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.”

Most of today’s observers have come to rather nuanced conclusions. In their view the war was result of an exceedingly complex situation. And while each and any of the European powers had contributed to such an instable system not one of them was able to manage it. Christopher Clarks “Sleepwalkers” illustrates this line of thinking.

Gerry Docherty und James Macgregor try to draw a different picture. In their “Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War” they say, that a certain faction of Britain’s upper class is to blame. In essence Docherty and MacGregor concur with the so called encirclement doctrine, which became popular in Germany beginning in 1907 – and again after the German surrender in 1918 and the horrible consequences of the defeat.

Of course Docherty and Macgregor, both Scotsmen, do not have to rely on the word of German leaders, who after the war had every motive to deflect attention from themselves. They try to make sense of what has been unearthed during the last 100 years. That is the strongest point of the book. The weakest point is, that they are not able to produce something like a “smoking gun” for their main argument. Theirs is a new and old narrative of what had been happening before the start of the war. In this regard, it does not differ from the accounts, which are given by the mainstream historians. Much of their narrative can’t be referenced either.

The secret elite came into being during the last 20 years of the 19th century. It was an offspring of the traditional English upper class, mainly consisting of aristocrats, manufacturers and top level civil servants. Caroll Quigley, an American history professor, calls the clique in question “Milner group”, after one of the trustees for Cecil Rhode’s legacy. Cecil Rhodes and Lord Salisbury were the “departure points”, from where the band had started out. Both of them died after the turn of the century. They cannot be counted as players in the years leading up to 1914.

The Milner group in itself for sure has to be considered. Writes Quigley: “To be sure, this secret society is not a childish thing like the Ku Klux Klan, and it does not have any secret robes, secret handclasps, or secret passwords. It does not need any of these, since its members know each other intimately.”

The conspirators must have become convinced that their own business, even the very existence of the British Empire, was endangered by Berlin. That’s why they ushered in a long term policy to isolate and destroy their continental enemy No. 1.

After a landslide election defeat in 1906 the Tories, to which the Milner group had a natural leaning, lost power. But for various reasons this did not affect the political clout of the cabal.

Although almost all members of the bloc had been conservatives, the “chief exceptions were the four leaders of the Liberal Party after Gladstone, who were strong imperialists: Rosebery, Asquith, Edward Grey, and Haldane. These four supported the Boer War, grew increasingly anti-German, supported the World War in 1914, and were close to the Milner Group politically, intellectually, and socially.”

So ironically whig governments turned out to be the ones, that let Britain side with detested czarist Russia. They prepared the war against the central powers. To conceal that to Liberal MPs, his political base, Grey had to resort to permanent obfuscation and disinformation. The crucial year came in 1907, when a British-Russian convention was signed, thereby giving birth to the Triple Entente. This change of sea was accompanied by Alaxander Isvolsky on the Russian side, whom Docherty and Macgregor suspect to have been an asset of their hidden élite.

“The growth of national resentments across the Balkans against Turkey and Austria-Hungary”, they write, ” was deliberately stirred by the agents of the Secret Elite”.

“Serbia was groomed for a very special role. She was perfectly placed as the epicentre for a seismic explosion, that would blow away the old order.”

“(But) As far as the secret elite was concerned, the raison d’etre for the Balkan crisis was to get Austria to react to severe provocation in order to draw Germany in. It was about Germany. It had always been about Germany.”

In the previous crises in the Balkans and North Africa Germany had reacted in a rather defensive mode and the only blame that could be attached to Berlin in July 1914 was, that it did not urge more restraint from Austria Hungary. But Germany’s Geo-strategic position was already set at this point in time and could not have been altered.

This angle is very much contrary to what German students were told in high school and the opposite of what their mainstream professional historians have taught (at least after Fritz Fischer’s Germany’s aims in the First World War in 1961).*

Douglas Newton, the author of the second book, is not an academic outsider like the Scotsmen, but he is not English either. He is Australian and he is much more mainstream than Docherty/Macgregor. His recently published “Darkest Days” deals with what happened in London the week before the British declaration of war in London. Newton doubts that the UK had no choice but to enter the war.

He concentrates on how the war party in the Asquith government managed to have its will, although many Liberal MPs objected to a war.

“The minority of Cabinet interventionists eventually ‘jockeyed’ the neutralist majority into a rushed choice for war on Sunday 2. August, in the shape of a pledge of naval assistance to France. The pledge locked Britain into any war before news of the German ultimatum to Belgium.”

“Throughout the crisis, the Cabinet’s pro-Entente leaders were manipulative and deceptive. They made crucial decisions outside the Cabinet, which steered the neutralist majority toward war. There was no democratic decision for war.”

But neither Asquith’s deception tactics during the July crisis nor the (un)democratic character of its decision are at the core of the issue. The English politicians might have acted hesitantly then and they might have squandered opportunities to preserve peace in doing so.

But all in all London cannot be blamed to have jumped the gun or to have acted as a fire accelerant – not in July 1914. Of course the same can be said of Kaiser Wilhelm and his chancellor Bethmann Hollweg at the time.

This is true, although there had been powerful lobbies both in England and Germany, pushing their respective country onto a path to war.

It was prior to July 1914, that Asquith, Haldane, Churchill, Grey and Lloyd George had been at the service of the war party in UK: by their massive naval rearmament (which, admittedly, can be seen as a response to German action); by their plans to strangle Germany by a naval blockade, by the creation of an expeditionary force and their secret diplomacy with France and Russia, as well as their help in corrupting the Belgian neutrality. The whole Triple Entente was not a defensive scheme to boot.

One can regard this as the natural foreign policy of Liberal imperialists. Or you can concur with Docherty/Macgregor in saying, that those politicians had helped in fulfilling the wish of an all powerful secret group, the destruction of a competing world power by all means necessary.

***

Andreas van de Kamp is an independent Journalist

SOURCE:  http://staatsstreich.at/world-war-i-britains-share-of-guilt.html

* Indeed, to this day, school children in occupied Germany are indoctrinated to believe the long discredited view that World War I was entirely due to “German aggression”.  When asked, many balk at the notion that it could have been anything else. They will tell you that you must be crazy.

Why this indoctrination? Because it otherwise may lead them to question German guilt with respect to World War II (and everything else under the sun). That is strictly “VERBOTEN!”

Free Germany

Posted in England, Germany, Great Britain, Versailles, Word War I | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments